This is only until they aren’t. And what then?

Do you not understand how living in a capitalist society works? If you can’t make a living with your art, you’re not going to have time to practice your art (since, you know, you have to waste all your time in some other soulless dead end job), and you certainly aren’t going to spend thousands of dollars on an arts…

People don’t want or need art? Ok bud sure we’ll take your word for it.

Arguing with “AI” proponents is like arguing with chatbots. You countered one metaphor with another metaphor, and the damn thing is now having a “you introduced a paradox into its logic circuits” meltdown.

I mean, do you believe I thought you were talking about literal genies?

“AI” “art” proponents are so up the ass of corporations and their slop-producing, infinite growth, anti-worker agenda, they think eradicating professional artists is some sort of tedious labor-reducing favor being done to them and human civilization.

lol

I’ll take “Whataboutism” for 200.

“The irony of people on Kotaku whining about the technological advancement of humanity”

“Wasting tens of thousands of dollars to build expertise in something people don’t want and don’t need - which is why they aren’t paying you to do it”

Hey fucking bootlicking moron

See the difference here is that small indie devs usually care about sharing their creation with the world. Not about pushing meaningles filler into storefronts. So they will actually put the effort into their work or commission someone who can. AI trash is not made by people who want to create, only by people who want…

Buying asset packs made by people is better than using AI.

Even the blandest human-created art is inherently better than anything made by AI.

It’s really shocking that this famous person is polite to that other famous person.

Yawn, get a better argument. When you layer the defense of your horror tech on logical fallacies like False Equivalence, you build no foundation to credit the thing you’re trying to defend. Keep trend hopping. Maybe you’ll get billionaire rich off the next grift.

He is literally the #2 guy in one of the overtly damaging cults of the 21st century.

It really isn’t. People use photoshop. The company would have to pay an artist to perform the task. Removing the job for one company is not an issue. However, once Capitalism gets to the point of replacing most jobs with robots/AI without some sort of UBI in place, then expect wealth inequality to worsen such that…

It’s not just that he’s proselytising it, he’s been the de facto number 2 after Miscavige. He’s not just aware of the abuse, harassment, blackmail and borderline slavery of lower ranking Sea Org members, he’s responsible.

How often do you use Photoshop? Just trying to gauge how off base your comment is.