Idiot, I’ve literally provided you with the link to the thread twice. That was the only comment you posted. For the third time.

Lol, the poster calling you intolerant wrote this:

Once again, there is no context, you stupid troll. You simply posted that one comment, not any longer argument.

Yes, you are wrong. And, I’ve supplied the link that proves it. You have no point with respect to this comment. You are nailed dead to rights.

Nope, nice try you piece of shit. You only posted that one reply, not as a part of any bullshit argument you are trying to fabricate ex post facto. You’re a huge racist, everyone knows it:

Racist also ignorant of the definition of disenfranchisement. Shocking!

...and you’ve got a racist in your replies who is posting garbage in defense of the White Supremacist-in-Chief. His evidence? A tweet from that right-wing nutjob Dilbert creator.

.

Virulent racist defends fellow virulent racist. News at 11.

No one said they were, troll. Try again.

Quite right. But it was mocked in the mainstream press both at home and abroad, which kind of is “the entire world” or pretty darn close.

Shit, my bad. Meant to post that reply to Romostradomus Rises Once More, not you. Sorry about that.

Good call. He’s a fascist troll who denies that he himself is a racist despite posting shit like this, so he’ll never accept any evidence you’d offer.

Sure, troll. Whatever makes you feel better about being a complete dumbass. Don’t worry, you’re also a piece of shit...so you have that going for you too. 

Yes, idiot. Glancingly is a word and it takes two seconds to check. Looks like you need to go back to school.

Wow, he’s been using this one since as far back as June 12:

New one:

Sure thing, ya racist dummy:

Hey, it’s a triggered white supremacist. Isn’t he pathetic: