Eric Lindros: “The hit on Crosby didn’t look that bad. I wouldn’t stop playing.”
Eric Lindros: “The hit on Crosby didn’t look that bad. I wouldn’t stop playing.”
Can’t mentally separate him from a young Draco Malfoy.
Dele I understand, but Kane? For shame.
Why should we care about who’s below us in the table?
Let’s do our reveling regardless. COYS!
OTtenham are much better than Arsenal, won 2-0, looked like a class well above Arsenal, could have score 5-6, ended 22 years of St. Totteringham’s day and continued to put the pressure on Chelsea. There. Anything else you need to salve your ego?
Probably the first strike by a Turk that didn’t result in detainment by Erdoğan.
Cool. Are we gonna get a recap of Sunday’s NLD or what? I know the Deadspin staff are die-hard Gooners (it autocorrected that to “Goobers”—which is accurate) but... it would be nice to do some revelling TBH.
Haha okay. And if the playoff format was rational, the Rangers would be playing Pittsburgh right now
I understand why he used 91 degrees as it’s easy to visualize but I was referring to scoring angles. I could regurgitate but found a website that explains it well;
Yeah, there were essentially two in back-to-back games against the Red Wings in the last few games of the season (that he shouldn’t have been playing on because of leg injuries but whatever he’s a goddamned king). With Karlsson, it’s never *just* luck.
The goal happened 50 seconds after this apparent “icing” with the rangers failing several times to get the puck out. Add on the failed gamble of using their timeout so early... There should be no real argument here.
I bet you’d still see a hockey coach out there.
I think the argument that it happened twenty seconds later is crap. If they had had to go back and get back onsides, then the puck probably isn’t in the Sen’s zone, or a Bruin doesn’t win a race to a loose puck, or any number of things change.
I cannot argue with your point about whether or not someone needs to be an educator to be successful as the President of one. I do think that stating that a public university employs “hundreds of thousands” of people is probably a fairly gross over estimate. Maybe 10,000, or even more, but certainly K-State (and most…
Sorry dude, but this is a ridiculous, overly simplistic argument and you should feel bad for making it.
Beat me to it, but excellent comment
I’m sorry, this solid take betrays your username.