That... That is excellent! 

I have a friend who is the GOAT in formulating these kinds of ideas. Lets call him William.

Second guess an Architect? Oh yes. Civil engineer? Quite a bit less.

You know that defense for the CoT is bull, right?

I know some dealers were doing this so that they could repo the cars with delinquent payments more easily.

It actually looks right to me. The large gap above the tire makes me think about how much suspension travel must be available in the car.

Exactly. Your arrangement sounds very similar to what I try to achieve. Give a tenant ownership of a house, let them do what they like so long as it isn’t too far out of the norm and reimburse for them for what it cost (within reason).

I’m assuming that by freeze all payments they also meant that employers could freeze wage payments - and that the $500/week would then be the stipend the entire country is living off of.

Around here its even illegal to live in your own van on your own plot of land... What you need are 3 plots of land and to take a 5 day road trip since you can only spend 120 days a year ‘camping’ on a parcel around here.

Yup. I understand that completely. I’d rather have a tenant that I don’t need to worry about than endlessly squeezing dollars out of countless people. There are externalities to ‘dealing’ with people - like time and frustration - that I just don’t want. If my meetings with my tenants are cookouts in their backyard or…

Am a landlord but I don’t look for huge profit from rent. In my book rent covers the mortgage and maintenance and that’s it. Selling the property after a decade of 12% growth is where profits exist.

At least there is water in that pool. I don’t understand what if happening in this Opel GT ad:

Real articulate.

Did you happen to read further into my post? It seems like multiple people stopped at that first paragraph and never read further. Invans stated that all money should go to individuals, full stop, and I was simply taking that thinking to its extreme end. We all know that the true leverage from the government should be…

I’ve already addressed this further up. Double check your reading comprehension.

Yeah, so I never said trickle down worked. I said we shouldn’t allow a necessity like airlines to fail completely. Nor did I ever say we should pay people less and less. You like to attribute a lot to me, you know?

Heh. I don’t think you’ve actually read anything I wrote.

Hey, we could dream right?

Expand ‘they’.

Straw man in what respect? That I was telling invanz that giving all of the trillions to the consumers also doesn’t work? Straw man arguments are when you set up an un-associated and easily dismissed point. My point is just as easily dismissed as invanz. If you cared to read further you would have understood that.