Maria Hill: What does S.H.I.E.L.D. stand for, Agent Ward?
Maria Hill: What does S.H.I.E.L.D. stand for, Agent Ward?
I don’t trust anything with an acronym that long and convoluted.
Don’t forget tomorrow starts the new KINJA rule where they can use your photos....
KINJA does not have permission to use imaged of my giant dong.
Still, plenty of Native voices said they felt erased by her vague apology about “mistakes” and that her words didn’t go far enough:
SHE NEVER CLAIMED TO BELONG TO A TRIBE. God damn. Why do people insist on pretending otherwise?
Confederate statues - “We need them! We need them as...uh...a constant reminder that slavery is bad! So we can learn from history or something!”
A month ago, Splinter was fawning over her (maybe a bit tongue-in-cheek, but still).
Counterpoint: from all accounts, the nickname seems to seriously piss him off, and I enjoy that very much, so I suggest that everyone continue using it. Thank you.
And, just like wrestling, it really sucks when a lame heel is champion.
If they were allowed to hit each other with folding chairs, I’d watch.
Great comparison! I despise cable “news”
Marianne Williamson is an internet god who probably had the best night of any candidate during Wednesday’s Democratic debate. It would be so great if she did not also have some, shall we say, questionable views about science and medicine.
It would be so great if she did not also have some, shall we say, questionable views about science and medicine.
She has zero percent chance of being the nominee, why is Cooper even bothering with her?
Last night, spokesperson for Justice Democrats Waleed Shahid responded on Twitter to Claire McCaskill, a former Senator who lost her race in the Midwest, who said that “free stuff from the government does not play well in the Midwest.”
“free stuff from the government does not play well in the Midwest.”
This will probably get shot down, 5-4, based on the well established legal concept of “baddus fora Republicanum”
In her email, Lazar of the Globe tells Mayer not that the story was “too weak” factually, but that it was “too weak” because they could not do it without the woman’s participation.
You’re making a distinction without finding an actual difference.