This is good, but lets hope some of these bubble candidates start dropping out. The threshold for the October debates is the same, so theoretically we could have more than 10 again if people like Gillibrand, Steyer or Gabbard get over the hump in the next six weeks.

That too.

I’m extremely impressed with the ability of the folks at MSNBC to not burst into laughter at him.

But it does, especially in this context. Considering all the shit Trump has done that the GOP has either supported or brushed off its not amazing at that no republican has called him out for his antisemitism.   Its just par for the course.

and it’s amazing that not a single Republican today has called him out for it,” Hasan concluded.

reportedly approached the White House about a new project called the “Safe Home” initiative—an acronym standing for “Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping Overcome Mental Extremes”

Then just like the morons who wouldn’t vote for Hilary knowing who Trump was and what he represented, but voted for Stein, wrote in Bernie, or stayed home anyway...they’ll get what they deserve.

Each of the 16, varied and independent universities, new organizations, research organizations, and consulting firms who’s polls were approved by the DNC.

A guy reads one article by a guy who’s wild guess ends up being right, and he thinks he’s an expert on the electorate.

Dude...its called google . Its this website where you can type a question and it gives you an answer. In fact if you took the time to look instead of just asking me the same thing over and over again you’d realize that Delaney made it because if the 20 candidate cap and the tie-breaker rule (which is explained in one…

But if a group of people are to work together, all of them need to to have an equal voice for the group to be effective.

I’ve explained it 100 times. You just refuse to acknowledge there is one because it left a candidate with almost zero support on the debate stage.

You’re grasping at straws dude.  Just like with the moon landing there is no amount of evidence or documentation or whatever that will satisfy you.  No one is keeping these morons from running for President.  There is nothing wrong with the DNC having a threshold the candidates have to meet before they can be part of…

Finally ok. No one knows. THAT’s the problem. Are you ok with not knowing? I am not.

I was already aware. That’s why I said “if that’s the standard”. Don’t presume.

This would be a whole hell of a lot easier if you actually knew what you were talking about, and just didn’t blame it on the “establishment”. You didn’t need to both to qualify, but if you had both you were automatically in. If you only had one it had to be the polling. Not the individual donors. There is and was a…

I’ll repost so we’re clear:

These are literally the standards to make the first debate: receive donations from a minimum of 65,000 unique donors, with at least 200 unique donors per state in at least 20 states, and to attain 1% in 3 out of 16 different polls. And don’t put on your tinfoil hat and say “they didn’t even put him in some of the…

Well Delaney was recently a member of the House who decided not to run for re-election, and is a registered Democrat. Gravel hasn’t served in office since 1980, and he put on his tinfoil hat and switched to the libertarian party.  Maybe that has something to do with it?

FFS...the DNC like they do now. And if Gravel has so little support for the party’s nomination of the most powerful job in the world that some nameless corporate boogeyman can just decide he can’t be on their poll then he doesn’t have enough support to debate.