I knew a kid in high school who hated his teachers. He was always in trouble, didn’t paying attention, and never turned his work in on time. I’m sure it was his teachers’ fault for not teaching him hard enough though.

It wasn’t an insurmountable deficit at all, yet here we are. But ultimately the choice falls on the voter, and enough voters chose to either stay home or vote third party and directly helped a virulently racist, reality tv show star who couldn’t keep a casino from going bankrupt get the most important job in the…

Am I? Or are you failing to realize, that in 2016 just like in 2008, there were a group of voters, whom no matter what Clinton would have done, that were just flat out not going to vote for her because reasons? The only difference is that in 2016 there were enough of those people to swing the election to Trump.

yes, yes, Not Mad, Actually Laughing.

I’m not screaming...its more of a chuckle at your premise actually. The thing is I’m all for a candidate who will run a better campaign that HRC did, but the Dem nominee, whomever it ends up being, will not be the perfect candidate to every voter on the left,regardless of whether its far left or center left or…

Complete and total bullshit. A POTUS election isn’t a TV or a phone. There is an inherent importance to it, and if people don’t understand its impact and the responsibility they have then they are idiots. A candidate’s bad campaign doesn’t absolve those voters of their idiocy.

Look up at the ceiling and you’ll see the point flying directly over your head. If you PAY ATTENTION you KNOW that presidents appoint SCOTUS judges, and anyone who NEEDED a candidate, or in the case of your example a tv ad, to convince them that those judges are extremely important is PART OF THE PROBLEM.

Yeah, but she didn’t promise them a unicorn in their garage and a money tree in their yard.

Man, sure would have been great if you had paid attention, huh?

Didn’t Baker v Carr establish that gerrymandering was subject to judicial review, and that each vote had to carry equal weight? This decision will pretty much allow state legislatures claim that their redistricting is “political” when in reality they will use it to discriminate against minorities.

51.6% of eligible voters in Texas voted in 2016, and 21.%5 voted in the 2014 primaries. Beto lost to Cruz by just over 200,000 votes.  Are you really going to argue that voter turnout in Texas isn’t going to make a difference?

Around 40% of eligible voters didn’t vote in 2016, and POTUS elections aren’t really affected by gerrymandering. Had more people voted for HRC, especially in states with low voter turnout or razor thin margins like WI, MI and PA, then Trump wouldn’t be POTUS, and the court wouldn’t have added two Federalist Society…

The real geniuses are the people who were too stupid to realize that Clinton offered them the chance to appoint two SCOTUS justices who weren’t Federalist Society zealot hacks.

Didn’t stop them when they decided Bush v Gore.

13,080 votes in Michigan, 27,257 votes in Wisconsin, and 68,236 votes in Pennsylvania.

Chuck Todd does suck, but a ten person debate format makes what is bad about Chuck Todd worse. They have to either find a way to whittle the field down more, limit the whole thing to one topic, or maybe do four nights of five candidates instead of two nights of ten.

...briefly introduced the possibility that Durant could opt in for the sake of getting paid $31.5 million just to recover for a year, but he’s decided to pursue a new contract immediately.

Who un-greyed you?

But you can, so why don’t you?