As long as we agree on the destination, it doesn’t really matter what route we take to get there.

While that’s unfortunate, it doesn’t have any greater impact than as it relates to Jussie’s personal space.

Because it doesn’t necessarily matter that this event didn’t happen. It matters that it could happen.

...we learned that Amazon is weak.

Perhaps if enough people organize effectively, we could convince Amazon to actually pay its goddamn taxes.

Not looking good for Smollet...

Hilarious typo aside, you just keep proving you’re either too dumb to understand my point, or you’re just trolling. Its mind boggling that someone can’t understand the difference between one article in a blog in Vermont that no one has heard of, and an actual story in the context of a national election.

If Trump is 6'3 and 243 pounds then I have a legimate chance of being un-greyed someday.

Sorry, but some blog in Vermont doesn’t make it a story. Now let me just get this outta of the way...

If you don’t understand the difference between a one story on a local Vermont website, and a story written and covered by essentially every major news outlet in the country...I can’t help you.

You really should have stopped after “I think they are good.” The theory about kids having more allergies has nothing to do with vaccines or the diseases they protect us from. That is a completely different discussion having to do with antibiotics, acetaminophen, and diet.

McCain, Sanders, and Christ Christie all have/had reputations and accusations levied against them about staff abuse. All powerful political figures, all ran for President, and never were those stories nearly as big as this one. I’m not defending Klobuchar. I’m not saying the hostile work environment for congressional…

Your argument is meathead bullshit. It’s “well they didn’t get in trouble...” That’s a toddler argument. Congratulations, you’re five.

The only thing embarrassing here is the obvious lack of ability to have a nuanced discussion about a story that has more than one angle of discussion to it.

If you think I’m suggesting she should get away with it because she is a woman, or that I’m defending her actions towards her employees you should go back and read my comment. Specifically part 1. Having the opinion that this is only a story because she is a woman POTUS candidate, and that the story itself is bad are…

Who cares if it was the first time you heard about the Sanders story?

I’m not moving the goal post at all. This entire discussion is happening within the context of the fact that she is running for President. Otherwise this would have been a story long before 2019.

I disagree. Obviously negative stories come out when a national profile gets raised, but its this specific story that gives me some pause. You can’t tell me that there haven’t been other POTUS candidates who were hard on their staff. McCain had a famously bad temper. Trump basically pits staffers against each other…

This is the first time I have ever heard a story like this about a POTUS candidate, so unless no one who has run for President has ever been hard on their staffs then this is in part a story because Klobuchar is a woman.

Not exactly. There is a link detailing stories of other male politicians in the article, but none of them ran for President. Unless you’re telling me that no other presidential candidate has ever had reputation for being tough on staffers (IIRC McCain had a famously bad temper), then this is a story in part because…