Man who wants to be POTUS refuses to tell voters what he would do if he was elected President.
Man who wants to be POTUS refuses to tell voters what he would do if he was elected President.
I’m not sure what’s more scary...the suggestion that public schools should have bible studies, or that people actually think this is a genuine concern of his.
Everyone should be very afraid of a third party candidate. Stein got more votes than the difference between Clinton and Trump in WI, MI, and PA. In other words Stein and her voters are just as responsible for Trump and Trump voters. If you want Trump to win in 2020 then vote third party.
So he’s basically a republican calling himself an independent as a campaign slogan because he knows it will get him some press (and some votes from people who don’t take their vote seriously).
So in other words you’d vote for any con-artist who decides to call themselves an “independent” as a meaningless campaign slogan, you don’t take your vote seriously, and you’d love to see another four years of Trump. Got it.
The uncouth cads.
Beginning of the end...now lets celebrate with some Airplane! gifs...
So what if it only happens once? If I bought my kids a house that sure as hell would only happen once. Plus I get to just decide exactly what happens to the money at any time just as I would decide who I bought a taxable gift for. I dont have to leave my kids a penny. I could donate the whole thing to charity, I…
That sounds good in theory, but in reality it won’t move the needle. McConnell is worth over $10 million, Corker is worth over $23 million, Ron Johnson is worth over $10 million, Greg Gianforte is worth over $135 million...these guys could care less about their government salary. I really don’t think cutting them off…
There’s no transaction/business taking place in case of inheritance.
Government shutdowns should be illegal. Every budget needs to have a clause that says “after this budget expires, if a new budget is not passed, then this budget will continue to until one does.”
But its not the same money. If you define “same” as money that person X owns, it becomes different the second it passes to person X’s kids via inheritance. Its not different than when my money becomes the store’s money when I buy my coffee in the morning.
And no Splinter, I don’t need my flash player updated.
Before anyone makes any rash judgements, I really think we shouldn’t comment until we see every angle of the video and the Today show interview.
The reality is that he is the best the Democrats can get from a state that red.
I understand this. I’m questioning at what point is he essentially caucusing with the GOP, so whether or not he gets replaced by one is irrelevant.
Its tough to blame a Dem Senator in a red state for voting against the party some of the time, but at some point you have to wonder what the downside would be to cutting him off from the party.
Voting against re-opening the government isn’t leverage for her. It can only hurt her even if her vote wasn’t needed. Every republican, Trump included, can use this to attack her. There is no upside for AOC. Its an unforced error.
What happens when a budget bill or CR comes up when her vote is actually very much needed, but she says no because that bill funds something she has campaigned against? She either causes the bill to fail, or she’ll get ripped apart because she voted to fund something like ICE even though the rest of the bill funds…