Weird comment to make under an article criticizing a woman for doing something wrong.

Reynolds actually owned Aviation Gin for a while, so there was at least some  involvement in the product there, compared to what’s essentially just an endorsement deal here.

Bingo. 30 seconds of searching on the Wayback Machine, & the case will be over.

Oh, that’s definitely Rowling.
Elon’s days were always numbered until the truth came out about how little he actually contributed to the things that made him famous in the first place. Jo actually did the thing that made her famous, so she’d still be sittin’ pretty if she hadn’t made the choice to lean hard into…

Johansson *is* producing a project for Marvel. But the fact that they don’t even have her voicing her character’s variants on What If pretty strongly suggests to me that she’s completely done with that role.

Anything that’s the combo of too wide to see around, too tall to see over, and too tinted to see through. Especially because those are invariably the types of drivers who throw a fit if anyone passes them.

None. I prefer it non-alcoholic.

Whoever wrote the introduction: When this article went up, The Marvels was already at $110 million worldwide. The truth is already bad; you don’t need to get facts wrong to make it look worse.

I’m sure a bunch of misinformation made a dent (like Variety’s recent hit piece, for example, which was full of “insider” info that has largely been debunked already because apparently they didn’t vet their source).

Yeah, he can keep his passive-aggressive BS.

Amen on budgets. Bob Iger even talked about that as far back as February. The confounding issue is right now we’re still working through projects that were in production before those budget reductions could begin, & with the extra delays from the strikes (& now reshoots on Brave New World that are almost certainly…

Very good point. Another article pointed out that, even with its horrible opening weekend, The Marvels still out-grossed the next *9* films combined.

In reaction to the vibe of calling people who correct misinformation “sweatily saying”.

I’m 90% sure the reshoots are to take her out of the story.

Agreed. And like I said, it’s gains across the board.

The article was written badly.

“About that new powerful bangle” is completely explained in the movie.

A big part of FNAF’s target audience probably also got some promo related to a cameo from somebody who isn’t in SAG-AFTRA & thus wasn’t forbidden from plugging the film. But that’s just a theory.....

That’s a good point. I have no idea what the promos looked like overseas.

I saw trailers & posters & billboards & internet ads & TV commercials & sponsored posts all over.
Merchandise got desynced by the change in release date, though. And, of course, the SAG strike killed cast promotion.