Rose wasn’t a thing during Davies run?  Huh. 

So, when Moffat created puzzle-box companions, it was bad. But now that Davies is doing, it’s good?

Did it seem like this article forgot to actually address the content of its headline? I mean, more than the vague notion that there will be some form of connection between the new run and potential movies?

Just remember - if someone is reviewing a program on this site (or I09) that doesn’t immediately conform to their pre-conceived notions of what should be, they will not like it.  Across the board contrarianism is the raison d’etre around here.

Is the rest of the article missing?  Because this is...succinct.

The big question is whether it is worth it to give this show another try.

The biggest problem? It looks terrible - and having that galloping bit of terribleness at the beginning of your show isn’t great, it hurts everything that follows (not in a major way, but bad imagery lingers as much as good imagery).

I recognize that adapting the first book, especially, would be difficult (due to being a collection of stories published serially), but honestly - this really shouldn’t be called Foundation. It waved at the idea and then left it behind pretty quickly, which is disappointing (if not unsurprising).

Oh, good lord. Who has actually been cancelled? I mean that - who has lost any kind of audience or market share because of the cruelty or bigotry of their positions? Not just losing ‘a’ show, or one particular venue that asked them to give them a pass - but an actual cancelling of their career and opportunities (you…

Likewise, this whole site is working overtime to pretend that Sandman never happened. 

Not only did you completely miss Dark, but, good lord, what did Sandman do to this site (and all of the sister sites) that you consistently pretend that it never happened?

Absolutely - came here to say that ‘Bells of Notre Dame’ may be the best show opener of any Disney movie. 

Bit of a deep cut, but he was the voice actor for the main villain in Baldur’s Gate II - and he was, of course, awesome.

This is just a random list, yes?

Good.  

It seems that the reviewers here and over at Io9 have decided that nothing will get published unless it is a hot take about how Marvel is now the Diane Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General in ‘Harris Bergeron’, of the movie making world.

Seems the reviewer doesn’t like Marvel movies (just look at the derisive tone to describe anything having to do with them), and thus, shockingly, found a way to not like this particular Marvel movie.  Imagine that. 

Is this more of Stewart’s ‘both-siderism, but vaguely edgy’ bit? Because that gets real old, real fast.

So, Peggy Carter is having a superhero moment, but she really shouldn’t?  This article really makes little sense. 

Absolutely - a fitting part of this list.