Lol. Tesla people are hilarious. None of that is accurate. Soooo ... you’re sort of like an automotive anti-vaxxer?

I think it’s gold leaf.

Jeeeez. Our country is screwed up.

Wait. You still think Harris has a shot? Ummmm. Good luck with that.

I would watch that.

Wait ... you really slapped your kids in the very back of your car directly facing an oncoming rear-end accident rather than placing them in mid-section safety-seats ... because it it’s more convenient to strap ‘em in back there?

Well .... my takeaway from this ...

Sooooo. It’s going to go for about 2/3 of a lap, get confused, and ram itself into a concrete barrier?

Except .... no. It isn’t.

Booker didn’t raise it by taking a cheap shot in the debate ... using a *very* iffy point of pedantry for context and a fig-leaf of cover. Booker gave an interview where he basically makes the same observation you do here. You asked for one literal example of a way to approach questioning Biden’s mental acuity that…

100% this.

So, just to clarify ... you are saying that this *is* an intentional direct attack on Biden’s age and mental acuity then? That’s how I read it too.

Yeah, it probably would have been better if he said that. But ..... Castro was wrong.

Are you kidding me here?

Indeed Biden is nowhere near the best candidate up there. But it’s a long road from there to saying that he is “bad”. He’s not. As long as he doesn’t select Harris as his running mate, I would happily vote for Biden over Trump every day of the week.

Well, you’ll never read about it here, but the problem with your premise is fact-checkers are now saying Castro was flat-out incorrect to assert Biden contradicted himself. And they seem to be right about that.

Hmmmmm. Desperate second-rate candidate ... behaving like a desperate second-rate candidate. Shocking.

When this congress started, I came into things thinking Pelosi was sort of a bad-ass.

Trenchant ... if unconvincing.

... along with the implicit right for citizen membership in a state-level militia equipped with military-grade equipment suitable for national defense. Too far down the “strict militia rights” interpretation path, suddenly the “is this needed for hunting” question becomes irrelevant ... and the implication becomes that…