I took that statement as saying if he tells the truth to Mueller, his answers would be inconsistent with statements he has made up to this point. Trump has a history of admitting provable lies rather than risk perjury when finally placed under oath. I think he’s worried the difference between past statements and his cu…

I foresee a bold future where Chelsea Clinton and Meghan McCain will battle from both sides of the middle for ultimate supremacy!

I find this persistent argument fascinating. I’ll assume you are not being disingenuous or intentionally obtuse.

So, actually, no.

An act of violence committed because some asshole is sitting there with double birds in another person’s face is not an act of political violence. That’s just an asshole getting in a fight for being an asshole.

Lol. A concert is not even remotely a forum for individual free speech.

Poorly.

In fairness ... his supporters are also planning a massive christening party for their shiny new border wall paid for by Mexico.

Actually, no. It’s that dinner that celebrates the time natives kept a group of frail immigrants from starving to death and dying.

That’s pretty much my take too. Although, I’d personally assume a video of myself being abused would likely be important in the future - and definitely keep it.

I don’t see amicable communication as evidence that abuse *didn’t* occur. That is an completely insidious argument anytime someone tries to make it.

So there are texts released, but what about the videos? From the descriptions they sound like iron-clad evidence of an actual physical crime. The son doesn’t have access ... but has seen them. So who has them? The victim? Someone else?

Are investors (or CEOs) holding stock in the hopes it will rise, who publicly promote positive information about the company they are invested in, equally horrid?

What the hell are you babbling about?

Shorting isn’t borrowing *against* something an investor doesn’t have. It’s just straight-up borrowing something ... against an investor’s ability to pay the agreed price on the agreed date.

1. Thanks for restating my point. “Troubling at best” is a pretty low bar to clear when justifying a concerted postmortem denigration of someone.

I think it depends on how old the people are. If I found myself single at 60 ... I’d absolutely date someone who is 30.

A few reasons I’m not particularly outraged over it ... and don’t think it is necessary or desirable to drag any of this out now.

I don’t even know. At first I thought it was serious. Then I got to the end and thought “geez ... that’s some high quality next-level snark”.

Oooooooor. You continue to completely mock Trump on this. This entire thing is the epitome of vapid nonsense. What does a “space force” even mean? You can’t abolish something that doesn’t really exist.