kevp453
kevp453
kevp453

Why? Is GDQ so sacrosanct that nobody else can do anything all week for just 30 minutes?

I don’t know about y’all but I’m super hyped for:

Lucky you, according to my Pokedex I’ve caught 21 of them. Caught some in the Fieldlands, and some in the Coastal area. None have been tall enough.

Chimchar will be a rare spawn where the sidequest will take you. I saw one there, but it ran away before I could catch it. Later in the game (after getting Surf) you can go back to the 1st level and get to an island that will spawn Chimchar easily.

Forever? Are you wanting security patches for your iPhone 4 still? Should Microsoft be updating Windows 98?

Lucky! I got a shiny Carnivine, but honestly I’m not a fan of Carnivine nor its shiny palette.

I’ve also got a V2 and V3 Wyze camera. What do you think is the acceptable amount of time they should update security (not new features) on their older cameras?

“This aint legal, he asked money to sell something that DOES NOT FUNCTION and heavily relies on an already purchaseable product”

So, they’re entitled to remedies under the law or the agreement. Under law, I can’t think of what law he has broken. Under the agreement, their remedies seem to be recouping damages. So, what damages do you think Crytek has been subject to?

Well, that's just nonsense. Of course you can write completely original code using zero assets from the game that will then change the game by putting in some files, it's not that crazy.

because he was charging money, they likely have a case to stand on”

I bought a FRAM oil filter for my car that can’t function without my Chevy. I bought a file system utility for my computer that won’t run without Windows. I bought a 3rd party ink cartridge for my printer that won’t work without my printer. All of those products require other products, and compete with the OEM

So? Why is that a problem? He isn’t selling any Crytek code or assets, all original code.

Why? What’s wrong with that? His code is completely original and uses none of the copyrighted code/material, but it doesn’t change the legality of what he has done.

What I find most interesting is that they aren’t going after him for copyright or anything like that, but for “violating the EULA”. Here is the relevant part of the EULA Section 5 “Software Use Restrictions”:

Again, I think market forces are going to be against your plan. Why would Ubisoft want only a 2-5% royalty on an item when instead they already have graphic designers that can make the items and they get 100% of the first sale and a larger % of subsequent trades? Also, licensing and copyright are trickier when used in

You have touched upon the one thing that an NFT would allow and that is cross game ownership across companies. Buy a cosmetic in an Ubisoft game and link your Tezos wallet to the next Halo game and have cross game compatibility? Yes, that sounds amazing and is a perfectly valid use of Blockchain. In this case Tezos

What I’m not seeing is a reason to use a blockchain for this at all. If Ubisoft wanted to offer limited edition, unique cosmetics to their games they could do so already. They could track player inventory for cosmetics like they already do. They could facilitate trading of items between players like you can with Steam

Apparently having a doctorate like this author wasn’t enough education to learn how to convey important information through writing.

For a while I would play it every couple of years and beat it in a single day. Now, with the advent of radomizers it’s given the game a 2nd breath in my view. Check out ootrandomizer.com if you want to give it a go.