Win or lose, Clinton was a decades-long public servant and a historic presidential candidate. I can’t imagine why some folks are so dead-set that she shut up and “go away” when they wouldn’t say the same for countless other politicians. Actually, I can.

Michigan is not a Democratic stronghold by any stretch. It is one of the top two or three most gerrymandered states in the country. The fact that Michigan is a swing state at all, in the face of having the deck stacked that much in the Republicans’ favor, is a testament to the efforts of Democrat Party organizers* at…

Guh. Putting aside the ancient question of who was really culpable for ending the band, Dave as depicted in this article reminds me of so many singers I know. Making decisions on the band’s behalf without consulting them was definitely an early sign that his days as part of a group of equal partners were numbered.

Seems weird to refer to Warwick Davis more by his previous work with Ron Howard than by... well, you’re all nerds, so I don’t have to finish that sentence.

Jim pretty much had nothing to do but grow up or get terrible. The arc where he was kinda sorta the boss was pretty much the last thing they could do with him, and it made him boring and unfunny. So they tried to go back to free-wheeling, unencumbered Jim, and it felt every bit as forced as it was.

“Nye contends that Disney failed to show any documentation backing up its claims.”

If we can’t jump to hasty conclusions based largely on a history of half-true negative headlines about Amy Schumer, who can we jump to hasty conclusions based largely on a history of half-true negative headlines about?

It's well-made and creepy, like a brand new white van without any windows.

It's well-made and creepy, like a brand new white van without any windows.

See, this does happen. But I suspect in a lot of cases where it supposedly happens, the "ally" has said something legitimately shitty and objects to having it pointed out.

Nah, it's definitely not that, unless you're trying to reduce and misrepresent it on purpose.

It means people think the Democrats' election chances don't hinge on energizing their own base (they absolutely fucking do), but on winning over a dwindling basket of Trump diehards who think you can be turned into a white supremacist by people not being nice enough to you.

Just an entire movie of Obi-Wan getting into bar fights and chopping off people's hands. The first couple times, he's quite shocked by it.

Ford pardoned Nixon because he believed America couldn't start picking itself back up again if it were still mired in the scandal. I'm not saying it was the right decision or that it made him a good president, but he knew it would make him politically unpopular and did it anyway. He doesn't deserve to be counted with…

Oh yeah, upvote #69. *Duffman thrust*

Mistake number one: "youthful and affluent demographic" is an oxymoron.

You know, that argument gets used on articles like these a lot, but it's not really the point.

You know… I'm on board with critiquing the blatant racism, ableism, and fucked-up gender dynamics in 300, which is all fair. It's stuff that's actually in the movie and is therefore ripe for comment. But there are a lot of other ways in which this piece comes off as just a bit lazy.

Nah, Wolverine was the Poochie of X-Men. Never before had Marvel insisted so aggressively that one of their characters was this cool.

"Why? Why lie about something so petty, so inconsequential?"