I always hate this “Men worked, women didn’t HISTORICALLY” shit. Like, if you know anything about how, say, a pioneer household worked, everybody was busting ass sunup to well after sundown. Go ahead. Churn butter. See how easy THAT shit is. And that was ONE JOB.

The irony is that the Republican party loves everything about the 1950s except for the tax code. But I guess that’s part of actually loving the idealized notion of the 1950s rather than the reality.

Yeah, but what women was doing wasn’t real work. Even if women were putting in more hours of back-breaking labor than the men, the men were still the bread-winners - as God intended. Or something.

This! “Well, I think the government should be as small as possible, except for when it comes to telling women what they can and can’t do with their own bodies.” GTFO.

We should let the market decide who has the babies from now on... I'm tired of BIG NATURE telling us how it has to be done

That shit drives me INSANE. If the government is so damn evil, why the HELL are you running to be in charge of it?

The whole “natural balance” thing kills me. If women were really “naturally” suited for nothing more than birthing and rearing babies, men wouldn’t be so afraid to let us try for more, since we would “naturally” fail. The fact that they have to put so much effort into ensuring we aren’t even allowed to make the…

The answer to that is; “No, I think it’s time for a great president who puts people’s needs over party and the needs of the country over corporations. I believe I am that president we need. When you reduce the job of being president to just gender, you’re demeaning both the presidency and women. Maybe you should work…

What a progressive or liberal who supports gender equality (Joe Biden) would say about a female candidate like Sarah Palin is exactly, “There’s no reason a woman couldn’t or shouldn’t be president, but [Sarah Palin] is not qualified to be president.” And then they would list the reasons why, including lack of…

I think the best way to answer the question is “Of course! People should elect the candidate who has the best skills to lead the country, no matter what their gender.”

Menstruating all over this once-great country.

I’m going to take a short detour into devil’s advocacy for a second, but just to be absolutely clear: I think Rand Paul’s politics are wholly repugnant, and he absolutely shit the bed here in about every way possible. I actually have contact embarrassment at how badly he handled that. But looking at the question from…

I’m not super stoked about Hillary as the Dems runner; but at least she’s fucking smart. All the GOP candidates just seem really really dumb.

You’re right. My apologizes.

“women physiologically have the babies.

Rand Paul is so sexist he assumes women will vote for Hillary just because she is a woman. Didn’t they make this mistake back in 2012 with Sarah Palin? If “any woman will do” was all that mattered with women, John McCain would have been our current president. Yes Rand, women are smarter than you think. Asshole.

I bet he doesn’t “see race” and has a gay friend, too.

I volunteer to kick HIS butt.

and women physiologically have the babies. I think women are going to still probably have the babies,