kcyclone
KCyclone
kcyclone

This... you want $81k for your ride, you could at least dust out that engine compartment and remove your slurpee.

Instead of throwing my own comment in, I’m just going to “second” what you said. Pretty much summed it up for me.

All of them?

For it to be a true museum quality Camry, it needs the “Camry dent” in the back corner. No dent, no dice!

I’m not suggesting these are “wrong”, but I hate the entire notion of “predicted reliability”. If you want to know how reliable a 10 year old car is, you take a survey/data from 10 year old cars. It’s nearly impossible to guess how reliable a car will be in 10 years based on the first year of information. A rattle in

Maybe I’m wrong, but I think these (in good shape) command this kind of money. The photos make it look clean, and if there is no rust and it checks out mechanically, I give it a nice price. 

I think you are right. I liked the style when the latest Civic came out, but there should be some differentiation (other than size) for these. Now, I also understand they want a good family resemblance and look, but there can be some more variation.

I will say this though: taken on their own, I think the newest Civic,

I would bet it’s more about sales figures and profit. The sedan segment isn’t exactly booming, so they are targeting what they believe are the largest target audiences for this car. Why make a turbo model if they only sold 10% that way before. (I do not know the numbers, so I could be way off there, it’s just my best g

That’s fair, how about $1,100?  :)

Early comments here are way too kind to this. I appreciate it’s in solid shape, and in 2022 it certainly would be unique.

However, it’s 35 years old, and as others mentioned, Lord knows what will need replacing. It has 70hp... 70. I realize things don’t always have to be fast, but I had a car in 1992 with 88 hp... and

This should have been the headline: Airlines non-stop efforts to shove more people onto planes now have them scrambling to keep weight limits in check.

I live in the suburbs in the US, so I “could” live with a massive vehicle... like an Excursion. I have zero desire to do so however. So for me, I suppose a full sized pickup would be my limit... at least I could haul stuff in it. For a daily driver, give me a 7 series or S8.

Packaging matters a lot here. For me, a compact hatchback, like a Golf is probably the smallest car I’d be ok with (if we are talking only one car), based on my size and family. But a compact sedan would be a pain in the rear with such limited storage. (I have little kids, so things like a stroller comes into play).

I forgot you could get a manual in this gen. Nice suggestion.

My wife would see “wagon” and not like it. She wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between this and Volvo. She has more in common with the average (non-enthusiast) person than the people on this Website.

I believe that BMW designers have an internal wager, where the winner of the pot is the designer that finally goes too far. (i.e. sales tank). I cannot believe we haven’t had a winner yet... which makes me fear for the future designs.

Well, sales are unknown... I mean Lexus isn’t hurting with their predator grill.  Fans though, I completely agree. (Not all of course, for the person that wants to argue this point).

This is just my take, but I think that the hyper-car has something to do with this. That is, nobody actually drives them, so the statistics are what matter the most. This behavior trickles down to super-cars, then sports cars, etc. Sure, the sports cars are actually being driven, but the manufactures all want to win

You sound like James May complaining about the Nurburgring.

I mean, I happen to agree with you completely, but I’m also yelling at kids to get off my lawn, so there is that.

I agree, and i realize this is nit picking, but I wish the center exhaust was either the same size or smaller than the outer ones. It looks strange being larger.