Because it’s not entirely relevant to what I was saying. My statement is objectively true.

Nope, I didn’t change anything.

Nope, that’s not what I’m trying to say. I’m saying the main point here is that America has been threatening to nuke North Korea for quite some time. Obama’s statement is still a threat, even with context. Hell, MacArthur wanted to nuke half the fucking country. Not a chance the North Koreans have forgotten that…

Except he did dumbass. “We could, obviously, destroy North Korea with our arsenals, but aside from the humanitarian costs of that, they are right next door to our vital ally, [the] Republic of Korea,”

Nope. But both are threats of total annihilation delivered in different contexts. Obviously Trump’s is worse because it’s the goddamn UN and he’s less tactful. But guess what, maybe I don’t think Presidents should ever make threats of totally destroying other countries. Imagine that!

It’s still very much a threat. One just has some nuance to go with it, but the threat of total annihilation is there.

Nope, doing nothing is the best option, as it usually is. Unless you want millions dead that is. You seem to believe America has an inherent right to decide what is to be done with countries around the world. It does not. And historically most of America’s attempts to make things better through force of arms have been…

You’ve enjoyed his threats to annihilate a country of 25 million? What the hell is wrong with you?

Maybe you should actually read some history, so you could understand WHY North Korea is the way it is. Hint: America plays a big role. And America never gave a shit about half the tin pot insane dictatorships around the world, so long as they weren’t enemies of the US, or even better, were allies.

Any war with North Korea to remove Kim Jong Un would mean hundreds of thousands if not millions of dead. Advocating for this is reckless and immoral.

You really think North Korea would see those two as particularly different? The casual way Obama said this is chilling in itself. You think that wasn’t said to send a message? Do you think anything a President says isn’t?

You entirely miss the point. When has regime change ever worked other than with Nazi Germany. Furthermore, there are regimes that the US supports completely that do those kinds of things regularly. Like Saudi Arabia.

They also suffered for a long time because of the total and utter destruction wrought upon their country by the US. Their continuing isolation and descent into bizarre cultishness is also a result of US foreign policy. What is this “something” that needs to be done? When does forced regime change actually make things…

You know, Obama also threatened to annihilate North Korea. Not at the UN, but still. At what point is this an American problem instead of just the personal failings of Trump?

They’ve reviewed Wolfe 3 times now, and trashed her all three times. I really don’t get why they keep reviewing her at this point, she’s not the most major artist around.

This review reads exactly the same as the one you wrote for Abyss. Why bother when you clearly don’t enjoy the style/genre?

You say this as if the North Vietnamese people didn’t largely support their army or the goals of the war.

Except the High Sparrow wasn’t corrupt in the slightest. Incredibly honest by Game of Thrones standards really. Also the only person in the series who really gave a shit about the peasants, so definitely better than Cersei.

Trump is all that, and a worse human being than Hillary. But he never destroyed another country. A sane functioning country wouldn’t have Hillary and Trump as it’s two choices.

You know what, maybe. Maybe a lot of American politicans should be on trial.