karl2m
karl2m
karl2m

You’re never gonna have your kick-ass military with a gun with such a delay. I’d rather give the money to the poor too, because like this it’s useless.

And once again you fail to even make one single argument. It’s all suggestion. OOhhh now I get it? Get WHAT? Don’t try to makes us believe you know it all. Tell us something that convinces us.

Which requests from foreign companies? I don’t know of ANY country except the USA that wants to spend 370 mill. $ a copy on a fighter plane. And by the way, once it gets up and close to a 100 mill $ Eurofighter, it gets beaten.

Sjjjst!!! Don’t say that, we’re not supposed to know that!

I’m sorry but the idea of building one aircraft for all 3 services is not a good idea. For instance: VTOL requires that it’s a single-engined plane. Most navy planes are twin-engined. So a new engine had to be developed for the F-35, while normally it would have been possible to use two existing engines. This new

Good point. In reality it wasn’t supposed to be too good off course. These days new planes are designed with capabilities they don’t need, and the capabilities they do need are omitted, Even the flaws are designed into them. That’s because fixing flaws and adding new capabilities is just another way of making money.

I might believe you, if you wouldn’t be so concerned about establishing your own credibility and trying to look superior, or use the credibility of others, only to disguise the lack of arguments for all the bold statements you make. Somehow I expect you to launch a credibility attack against me too. And all these nice

By the way, I have a family member whos cleaning lady is the daughter of the sister in law of the children’s nanny of the chief test pilot of the F-35, and she overheard him say that it’s a turkey. Now that’s a serious argument isn’t it?

“The F-35 will be perfectly fine”: how do YOU know? You make a number of points about the F-35 , but you don’t have a single good argument to back them up. You just talk about some old programs, but none of them gives us any kind of certainty about the future of the F-35. Or as you said yourself: “This isn’t 1965”.

“No pilot worth their wings is saying”....What kind of a fake argument is this? You use the credibility of a certain kind of people, but it is you who is defining who these people are and what they are like. I didn’t see many of these “pilots worth their wings” take part in debates yet, and pilots who did were largely

Buzz, stealth comes in different degrees. The F-22 and F-35 are “stealty”, they are far from full stealth. A full stealth means : -no radio emissions, only passive sensors. -no antennae of any kind, because they make excellent reflectors too. Only concealed antennas can be used, and for a short time only. -IR

It looks like a plaice.

Anyone who thinks that this is a difficult landing has never flown a glider.

I’m from Belgium, and i talked to some of the people who were involved in intercepting the UFO. It’s still unknown what they really were, but helicopters they were not. There have also been many eye-witnesses on the ground, and none of them ever reported helicopter sounds or even seeing any moving parts. The famous