This ought to be great news for Nintendo. They haven't had Doom since the N64.

As an Asian guy, id go for the yellow one.

Sorry, but OLED is nice, and has been great with me. I'm saddened by the loss.

The OLED screen is amazing though. I've had no problem with it at all.

How would they make money from Xbox Live then, if they did that they might have to start charging for it or something.

Spector's points, amusingly (to me), actually seem to be very applicable to both story-tellers and game designers.

Yep. I'd say The Walking Dead qualifies as a pretty darn good game and really, that game was just being told a story while pressing a few buttons.

Agreed especially since they are right in that picture.

I do, and I like the idea but not the execution. For other games I quite like it but AC, meh. Most of AC's story depth isn't conveyed through them. I also think they're heavily padded out and could do with some serious editing (the games, not the vids). I don't know, it's probably the overhanging sense of ennui I feel…

It's not that Sony "won't make it easy to pull their customers' info". It's just that they won't give them access to any info. At all. Many people on Raptr hate that they can't have their PS3 games and achievements tracked to see their progression. Raptr also posts the top games played every once in awhile, and there…

Dead accurate.

I'm not sure there's any other way to interpret Dennis Fong's statement.

QUOTE | "PlayStation on the other hand, has been very, very closed, almost to the point of ignorance."—Dennis Fong, CEO of Raptr, comparing Sony and Microsoft's policies for dealing with companies like his.

Why is that tradition broken? New historic character, new numbered game (even if it has a subtitle)

They are like arcade/Vita games. Not real AAA blockbuster ones. Calm your tits.

That tradition is broken.

Release a new Ip? I don't think they will do that. AC makes them too much money.

I have no problem following it. I must be a genius.

The naming convention actually makes a fair amount of sense, Numbered entries in the series identifying the entrance of new characters into the primary Desmond arc. So II, Brotherhood, and Revelations were all Ezio. His arc began when Altair's ended, and ends where Connor's begins.

AC4 is about AC3's main character's grandfather so no. Also Ubisoft said they only release a "new number" when there is a new main character, it is not about when. Also only AC2 had non numbered sequels. The main games go AC1, AC2, AC Brotherhood, AC Revelations, AC3, AC4. The rest I consider spin offs since they are…