And matches the arrogance, no?

God bless you. [and all those who dwell within the rocket house]

But to be fair, most studies of complex human behaviour cannot use true experimentation due to ethical concerns (hello Facebook!). So they're left with observation & case studies and something that is still attempting to use reason and logic to explain what is observed, but no, it's not as black & white as pure…

"The argument goes [that] if someone cannot reproduce your results when following your recipe, something must be wrong with either the original method or in the findings it generated."

Please don't invite them to come take our water. I'm sure they're already thinking of it, but that's like inviting a vampire into your home. You can never get them out again.

Ya, I've never heard of the suggested issues with ibuprofen.

It's Labatt's (and please don't drink that. That way, madness lies)

I wondered about that!

"in dire need of a responsible father figure" - dude, you know you're writing for Jezebel, right? Are you sure you needed to say 'father figure'? Because I think you meant 'adult guidance', no?

I think that would be very, very dangerous. This whole message screams MRA creeper.

I actually didn't realize that but I was going off to research it b/c it sounded just enough like "apart-ness" that I did wonder. For those of us in NA, "Apartheid" was a proper noun (like The Holocaust) but I did wonder if it was just a word as well, that had been imbued with historical significance.

I'm with you on 'apartheid', which is a word that only refers to the South African policies but I'm a bit mixed on

Apparently the names of the crimes vary by state. Could be '3rd degree murder' means manslaughter, etc.

Just... re...member that you're standing on a planet that's evolving. And revolving at 900 miles an hour.

OK, you goddamned whippersnappers, I don't understand no one has referenced original dogcow yet but here:

Right? Then each of us can toss & turn in our own hangups and bad nights without screwing t'other up!

<slow clap> (seriously, excellent point)

I'm just replying to try to boost up your comments. This is one of the most important points that many people miss and I want to make sure you get credit for it:

whoawhoawhoa... 'her looks are the only thing she has'? THAT is an objectifying statement.

I think it's not objectifying b/c she is driving/owning it. And if ever any outfit was a straight-up middle finger to the question of "well, what were you wearing when you were sexually assaulted", this one is.