kanekofan
kanekofan
kanekofan

Your editor changed the aspect ratio without consulting director or DP???

I was angry enough about the way that the DP’s role in color timing had been reduced as we move into a more post-centric model (I work in post, btw, but direct and DP small projects on the side), but now I’m all the more livid.

Plus, I don’t know that she’s ever offered an apology or done anything to make amends for her role in the Satanic Panic.

Schultz came to believe that his most effective characters were ones with one or two defining traits that could be mined for numerous variations on a theme, so, yeah, I’d say it was intentional Flanderization to some degree.

I was experiencing the fake scenery effect you describe for years before I ever tried my first hallucinogens.

I know people who absolutely feel that psychedelics changed their way of viewing the world in profound ways. For my part, though... well, I once let some friends read one of my trip journals, and their response

I think there are lots of good uses of contemporary music in period pieces - juxtaposition is one of the artist’s greatest tools, after all - but not in a context where the audience is expected to be fully engaged in suspension of disbelief.

You do not know of a single non-arranged marriage that didn’t involve cheating and/or divorce?

Of course, clicking “cancel” doesn’t actually CANCEL a comment I decided not to finish typing, it just posts it half-finished. Lovely. Editing it away now. What a great use of my time. Just ignore this.

But Prince Charles - whose marriage is the one being called abnormal and insane - did not have an arranged marriage.

I know it’s not a big deal, and everybody obviously knows what you mean, but I’m pretty sure your confusing screen tests with test screenings.

Wow, what a terrifyingly vanilla attempt at a sexually themed insult.

Can't dispute an argument that rock solid!

Is she smart? At least once per case, she says something that reveals she either hasn't listen to or hasn't remotely understood a significant part of what at least one party is saying. She seems to have trouble following any sentence with more than a single clause, either because she can't make simple connections or

Pretty much anytime someone accuses their opponents of being "politically correct," what they really mean is, "you're not comforming to what I think it politically correct."

What...? What...? WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN???!!!

Most people credited as “producer” on TV shows are just senior members of the writing staff. Contract vary, so it’s possible he could continue receiving a producer credit for awhile, despite no longer actually being in the show’s employ.

(DISCLAIMER: I HAVE A STRAIGHT FRIEND, I CAN TOTALLY SAY THAT.)

First off, the claim was that she can "seem ubiquitous," which of course was an exaggeration. But you're responding by suggesting that she's an esoteric figure, which is AT LEAST as far from my perception as is ubiquity. "Pretty nearly nobody" knowing who Kahlo is, based on my anecdotal experience, is a wildly

I first learned about Frida Kahlo in a high school Spanish class. I would be surprised to find out that I know a single person over the age of 18 who doesn't have at least some concept of who she is. She's pretty famous.

Even if we buy McCain's cause-and-effect scenario, it still doesn't meet my standard for "directly responsible," which really requires the responsibility to be... y'know... direct.

When I was a stoned college student (a period which lasted about 6 years) it wouldn’t have confused me, but it would have fascinated and delighted me. Now, on acid, then it might have confused me, but I would have had a pretty incredible epiphany that words couldn't have conveyed and that I would only have retained