I can not condone this blatant appropriation of cat culture.
I can not condone this blatant appropriation of cat culture.
Editing for localization is still editing.
How is something that’s specifically discussed in the movie an “urban legend?”
Didn’t you already post this argument? Don’t you have anything better to do than repeat yourself?
No, they call it editing.
Actually, I don’t think the audio puzzles are needed to complete the game. The problem is that since none of the puzzles are explicitly explained it may be tough to know which ones she’s missing the audio cues for, and which ones have just stumped her.
It sounds like Mario & Luigi's the better pick for you. Did you ever play Myst, and did you enjoy it? If so, then The Witness might still be in your wheelhouse.
That was true of wolves, too, but it only took a couple thousand years and some determination to change that.
There's no such thing as a "finished" piece of art. Recutting scenes for a different market is also part of how making movie works.
I'm not familiar with the show or situation you're talking about.
This is a very rugby story. This is like peak rugby.
Fair point! The difference I see between the two is that, generally speaking, deleted scenes end up readily available in some fashion (given the rise of online video sharing sites, I’ve seen a ton of behind the scenes and deleted scenes material put up online). The deleted or removed material in visual novels on…
Well since you can’t actually produce the statistics to support your argument
Read on and find out, I guess.
So those cut scenes from The Force Awakens lying on the editing room floor were censored? All editors are actually censors?
I believe I’ll go with the socially accepted practices, laws, and regulations of the land that no one has repealed or really challenged as a much larger marker of truth rather than things you are generally making up.
I disagree that a content creator can’t censor their own work. I think it just comes down to their reasoning. Localization is about making content more legible and consumable by different cultural audiences. Censorship is about seeking to alter the content to avoid some negative response or consequence to the…
It could be self-censorship in some cases, if they’re trying to meet the requirements of a gatekeeper, or keep from offending anyone. If they’re just making alterations to make the game more marketable in a different region, then I wouldn't call that censorship.
Then why didn't Bobby just say that?