Actually, so much of the current state of polarized politics is due to overly soft skin on both ends of the political spectrum, and in a world where everyone has a megaphone to whine or shout into.

Beyonce bore no ill-will with this lyric and did not intend on pushing some sort of ableist agenda.

For me it was a deeper exploration of the Force and how that might actually shape the philosophies that permeate the Star Wars universe.  The themes of the second game were a lot deeper and more interesting.  It’s a shame they were forced to rush the game to market because if they’d had the time to tie up some of…

I’m throwing a bone to the Jedi Academy and X-wing fans out there.  

I mean, isn’t America today rife for insensitive cultural satire?

“It’s wrong for the police to execute people without due process, but it’s okay when I do it” is certainly a perspective.  

You are very quick to give extra-judicial authority to people who have proven themselves unable to avoid abusing the authority they already have.

Are we just straight up acknowledging that it’s the cops’ job to shoot people without due process now?

Well that’s dumb, because a consumer VR market with only one product available is a dead market with no future.

These guys could barely handle the remastered ports, and completely bungled a remake. What in the world makes you think they’re ready to make their own game from scratch?

KOTOR is arguably the best Star Wars game.  

The only way to prioritize the lord over your money is to use your money to serve the lord.  Jewelry ain’t it.  

Then he’d have used that money to help the poor. 

Being dissatisfied with a game isn’t marginalization.

There’s a pretty thoughtful article at the top of this page that makes a compelling case otherwise.  

This is only nitpicky if you’re not in the community being marginalized.  

Not necessarily: certain physical traits help in certain sports. Shoulder width in swimming for example or muscle mass in weight lifting.

The fact that pics of the harassment were what got her banned would seem to indicate that it was more than “perceived,” since the content in and of itself obviously violated the TOS.  And not for nothing, but one party was displaying the content, while the other was using it to actively harass someone.  And it wasn’t…

I’m not attributing any stance to you. I’m talking in general about the stance that trans women should not be able to compete with other women in sports. The only logical justification for that stance relies on one’s belief that trans women aren’t “real” women, which is an inherently transphobic belief.

I think you’re splitting hairs. A stance that trans women shouldn’t be able to compete with other women is based on an inherent ignorant belief that trans women are not real women. That’s transphobia by any meaningful definition.