I think the best description I’ve heard came recently from Arthur Gies. A review isn’t about the reviewer, it’s about the reviewer’s experience with a game.

I think the review is the right place. By buying the game new you are condoning their leadership’s actions. You are validating the treatment of staff. If you choose to not buy it at all, or buy it used, you can avoid doing this and still show appreciation to the team that sacrificed parts of their lives for it.

I mostly agree, and of course this isn’t a review of anything. However, I do think an argument could be made that previous behaviour that affects customers is pertinent information?

This is all very scummy and worth writing about. I question whether a review of Cyberpunk 2077 is the right place to do it. People are looking for a review of the GAME, not the PUBLISHER.

Destiny’s actual endgame and depth is finding ways to not play Destiny faster

That’s amazing.

I’m hoping the AWE DLC makes up for the non-ending we got. 

I’m enjoying this puzzle because even though I’m not a raider or a top tier player, I can still contribute by running through the Corridors and sending my puzzle code to a community spreadsheet.

A 2 second clip taken out of context doesn’t spoil the ending. Darth Vader being in a game about a hidden Jedi being hunted isn’t all that surprising.

I would be surprised if they didn’t put vader in, given that he’s been in *skims notes* every single star wars thing set while he’s alive except Solo.

Well, this was unexpected. Hello!

Hi friend.

Just testing my privileges.

Don’t be so unbearable.

I imagine posting this will have grizzly consequences.

Gonna have to agree. Just fucking spectacular bears.

But what if your dipshot boss is an herb?

wow, great bears

Dammit, my gray ass can’t *post toy story 3 incinerator gif*