Kind of a biased sample to base your conclusion on studies from Manhattan where car ownership is way lower than normal and most people get around via public transit or taxi/uber and Seattle that’s disproportionately populated with granola hippies who love bikes.

I feel like the main structure of the tent looks pretty stylish, but the back really ruins it. Like most of the tent kind of continues the CT’s straight/angular looks, but then they got the to back and were like F it, and just threw a big loose blanket over the back.

Lol thought the same, they even cross-posted it to Jalopnik. I guess that’s one way to generate more clicks, write an incorrect article and immediately turn around and write an article about why the first one was incorrect. 

How many times do we need to publish the same article about LLM’s retaining the inherent biases of the world their training material came from and pretending to be shocked about it.

God these stupid truck tug of war videos are so stupid and pointless. All these idiots think it’s actually a measure of a truck’s strength/power but it’s just a measure of traction. If anchored to an immovable object, 95% of the trucks in these videos have enough power to spin all of their powered wheels so the…

Glad I’m not the only one! I’ve seen a bunch of cars mentioned as similar but you’re the only other person I’ve seen who had my initial reaction of being a baby RR. That sloped rear window and spoiler sticking out the back scream RR to me. 

With the sloped rear window I was thinking it felt like a range rover’s baby electric brother. 

They are telescoping so you can use the same exact bars not only across models, but for the R1T you can use the same bars on either the roof or across the bed.

I mean is it really that crazy to imagine someone might say “Hey there’s an upcoming product that I’m really excited about. It’s not coming out for a couple years but for a refundable 0.2% deposit, I can at least make sure I’m at the front of the line in 2 years when it’s released”

Maybe their logic is the S/T are only necessary in instances where the platform actually has both an SUV and Truck option and there’s no plan for an R2 truck?

Yeah thought the same. Like converting the water usage to how many radiators it can fill is odd enough. But to pick a model that was air cooled for most of its lifetime is extra odd.  

I love the irony in the variety of people who think Trump has their best interests in mind.

ZAP 280z. Yes I admit it’s not a muscle car, but it’s a sporty car from around the right era and the name is just perfect for an EV.

LOL GTFO with that nonsense. Spacex is a privately owned for-profit business that does *some* government work but a ton of non-governmental work too. Your idiotic comment is like me saying Boeing is “basically” a government entity because some of their planes are made for the military. 

I could make the same argument “All of space dedicated to hobby X should be turned into public parks(or homeless shelters etc)“ about basically any hobby you can name and it would be no more or no less valid than your silly argument. If you don’t like golf that’s fine, I don’t love it either. But if there are enough…

Depending how nit picky they get about what defines being “made” on site it might be easy for the big chains to sneak around this rule. Like if Subway has the option of paying its employees $x less per hour, if instead of shipping dough to each site, they need to ship dry mix and add a mixer to each site? 

Like full service restaurants? Sure, I might slightly favor one if it is newer/nicer. But a low-price sandwich shop where 95% of people are probably doing carry-out? I couldn’t care less. Especially since most subways are not free-standing buildings and part of a strip mall, there’s not much they can change exterior…

I mean, there’s just a tiny difference between transferring land between state and federal government versus transferring government owned park land to a for-profit commercial entity? 

It looks/feels very conflicted. Like it’s trying so hard to simultaneously be retro-muscle and futuristic-spaceship and pulls so hard in both direction that neither really works.

I mean your argument would be more valid if they were comparing like a Jag F-Type to a Camry. But we’re talking about a 4 door electric wagon/cuv bodied Jag so your comments about “completely different mentality” to the car buying decision aren’t really applicable.