I’m surprised you even get in the car, you seem like the type who walks to work uphill both ways!

In that case, it should default to being disabled on EV’s too until the owner provides proof they got their electrons from a low/no emissions source

+1000 on this. In my old office, I was on the third floor and my window looked out over the parking lot. It was so nice at the end of the day I would hit the remote start and by the time I packed up my things walked downstairs and out to the car, it would be nice and toasty.

Throwing a lot of stones for someone living (working) in a glass house

Based on the fact these things sell like hotcakes, maybe you just have unique preferences that diverge from common consensus? 

Except the height difference is due to variations in gravitational/magnetic forces on different points of the planet. So it’s not like digging a trough between two lakes that will cause the water levels to equalize. The canal would just fill up and settle to a water “height” that’s  not equal across the canal, but you…

If this is true, then why would all these companies continuing to voluntarily over pay their CEO’s when the primary goal of a company is to make money, not give it away? Do you think it’s some grand conspiracy or perhaps the CEO’s are all blackmailing their respective employers? 

Reminds me a few years back there was a show called something like “repo games” where they would go around repo-ing cars, except once they had the car all hooked up, they would give the owner a chance to answer some trivia questions and if they won, the show would pay off their note and let them keep the car.

+1, with the competitors all rolling out options with 300HP and 400+ ft lbs, the gladiator and its higher price tag and anemic engine simply isn’t compelling unless you’re a jeep die hard or really really want a truck that’s also a convertible. 

I should clarify, I don’t personally have any issue with this article in a vacuum. Just noting the hypocrisy of this specific author’s body of work in relation to this particular article.

I should clarify, I don’t personally have any issue with this article in a vacuum. Just noting the hypocrisy of this specific author’s body of work in relation to this particular article. 

Exactly, comparing the effective per hour compensation on contingent at-risk work to the rates that other attorneys might charge for bill-per-hour engagements where payment is guaranteed is 100% meaningless.

Except the difference is with cases like this, the attorneys are doing the work at-risk and usually any compensation is contingent upon a settlement/victory.

It’s funny because if any other site did this same article but female drivers I feel like Elizabeth would be the first to write an outraged article about how misogynistic it is.   

To be fair, starbucks has about 11 items under the “refreshers” branding and a lot of them do contain the fruit from the title, some even whole pieces. I think it’s just the flavors mentioned in this article that don’t actually utilize their namesake fruits. 

Are you telling me that my Nissan is not in fact built with metal from the Pathfinder space shuttle?

Except in your strawberry kiwi vitamin water example, the packaging very clearly says “Kiwi strawberry flavored + other natural flavors”

+1, seems like the real fault lies with 1) The driver not paying attention blindly following instructions and 2) The state just leaving a collapsed bridge open and unmarked.

I believe you mean richer version.

I’m well aware, hence my use of the past tense “would have had exactly the same amount of success”.