the actual report specifically says the increase is due primarily to sales of the PS4 and related network services.

Don't bother trying to find out. You didn't miss anything when he WAS somebody.

what the shit?!? This is Fox News level bullshit. "Now I'm not saying he's <air quote> GUILTY<air quote>, but it's certainly worth considering!"

Yes. I do. I also recognize that the library isn't set in stone. It may take time to roll out older gen games. You're just looking for a reason to hate on this. Nothing wrong with that. Just admit it and we can all move on.

What did you mean, then, when you wrote, "Right now only PS3 games on the service? lololol."

You might be right, but your mom won't see much from a class action suit. Certainly nowhere near whatever you believe she is owed. If GM's lawyers believe they could lose this case, they'll settle long before any judge hands down a $10 billion penalty. They lawyers will take a gigantic chunk of the money, and the…

No tissue or lotion dispenser? No sale.

The problem I have is that none of the articles describing this 'test' give enough info to understand how it is 'administered'. The original article says that Mr. Cancel brings the cup of water in with him. Then an update clarifies that it is water or food that the interviewee has drank or eaten during the interview.

It's an important detail, but just as important, I'd argue, is: did the interviewee even ASK for water?

This is exactly what I'm struggling with. If I walk into a room for an interview, and there's a full cup of water sitting on the desk, I'm not going to assume that it's mine to drink. Nor am I going to drink from it if I'm told the water was put there for me. Maybe I'm not particularly thirsty. Maybe I don't want…

So if they say 2015, Nintendo really means 2017, right?

I disagree. I don't make it a habit to buy expensive shoes, but I do have a pair of Ferragamo dress shoes for occasions when I need something very nice. In my old life, that could have meant an important company function, a meeting, a trade show event (not for the floor, but possibly for a hosted event in the…

Yeah, well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Wait. Dominos serves pizza?

This kind of victim blaming I expect to see on Gawker, but never here on Kotaku. For shame Velduanga! For shame.

I'd say it already happens. Not in a "day later" sort of scenario, but when a company takes down an online game's servers, people who paid money for that game are losing out. When Microsoft says they aren't going to support WinXP any more, the people who paid money for that OS (and still use it) are definitely…

You don't own the game. You license its use, but you don't own it. The money you pay for your copy is for the license, not ownership.

ok, I don't know if you're feeling heated toward me or what, but your post is pretty much a giant run-on sentence and I'm not sure if you're teeing up on me or what. If that's the case, there's no need for anger, I'm not taking sides here. Pointing out that Zenimax may have a case doesn't make me their defender.

I can't speak to the veracity any of the information you're presenting, but the fact is that if Carmack did any development on VR while an employee of Zenimax, then took that and gave it to Oculus, then Zenimax has a case.

Not really Kaz Hirai.