I really, really like Whitney Cummings, and I like the actor who plays her boyfriend and I like the Indian actor from Weeds and 30 Rock, so... I've watched pretty much every episode and I've wanted to like it so much that I no longer hate it... But damn, based on the first episode, I do not know how that show was…

So there have been like 50 replies since your "all these things are natural/being natural isn't good enough reasoning/you need a better argument" and it wasn't until the post directly before mine (unless someone jumped in there, or I happened to miss something) that someone actually provided an actual argument against…

Probably depends on how much of a voyeur fetish you have.

"Could a man come and help me with this? As a woman, I am incapable of [insert task, likely physical in nature, that she is unable, unwilling, or both, to perform]."

Anyone thinking Gawker Media/Jezebel should invite her to host her own, solo debate. She would get to answer all the questions! Just tell her people that Jezebel is primarily a site for women (true) and that you support her candidacy because she's the strong female candidate in this race (less than true). And don't…

I'm not one of those climate change or evolution deniers who derides sciences and denies it all, and while I certainly think what this article is suggesting is possible, I just find it hard to trust this completely. I mean, these seems like a really, really, really loose theory. You might be able to back it up with…

I don't know, her skin does have a certain porcelain quality to it in my opinion...

So, uh, this is totally wrong and everything... but this is also a totally awesome and genius evil plan.

I'm not a teen and I'm not currently depressed and it's been a while since I was involved in any sexting... but I have dealt with depression and I have sent and recieved sexts. That's about as far as I can vouch for this article though.

As the proud owner of a five or six year old Moto RAZR, I am offended by your use of the term "dumbphone". We find that term offensive and phoneist. Please use something less insulting, like "limited phone".

Good, interesting points on the first amendment to the both of you. The only point I would make is that it is legal to slander someone—so long as you are being truthful—however this has little to nothing to do with your right to free speech. As for the rest of what you said... we're going to have some disagreements.

Well my hair is lustrous and silky... Well, maybe not, but it is thick and beautiful.

Have you never heard that expression where if the whole world's population lived like the first world does, we'd need like 6 planets to sustain us. The industrialized world, on it's on, might not destroy the planet (so long as it stays the same size), and it's the developing world that will push us over the edge,…

Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Daleks!

What I have gained from this article:

Well, I know what I'm going to go post on my Facebook page...

To everyone saying the First Amendment doesn't cover private situations (i.e. your non-government employer can fire you for your opinions): do you not have a problem with this?

I think you miss one of the major points of this movement: that simply "having a job" often isn't enough to put a roof over your head, to feed the family, the pay of student debt, and so on. Many people in poverty have jobs, and many more just above the poverty line have jobs, doesn't mean they don't have anything to…

I've watched a little bit of American news (and I don't just mean FOX News), and I'd question how strict those rules are...

I feel like calling the Occupy protesters "lunatics" (technically that they were acting LIKE lunatics, but I'm not sure they'll see that technicality), may get you fired from working for them...