Welcome to the world of shareholders, where only growth is respected, whether or not growth is a good idea.

FCA doesn’t even want to wholly own FCA.

I don’t see anything wrong with this scenario.

Same reason a 737 has a blunt front side and a F22 has a sharp nose— we’re talking low speed aero here. The goal is to efficiently channel air around the car and not to stab through it. The frontal area of the car stays the same whether it sharpens to a point on the ground or is a blunt brick.

Lots of car companies hated grills in the late 80's through mid 90's, even amongst ICE powered cars.

After the Karma, it’s really difficult to consider anything else a true mustache:

I’m a little surprised you didn’t go with Sex on Wheels. Still TKK so I’m not complaining.

Relax. It’s called a refresh for a reason.

I don’t think anybody will claim it’s all new, since it’s just a very minor refresh.

It wasn't a merger, it was a takeover. The "Chrysler" in Daimler-Chrysler was slient.

We’ll make Mexico build them! It’ll be yuuuuge!

Wait, I messed this up somehow.

Am I the only one who likes the styling of the Dart?

hwy.

It’s funny. Of the 3 American manfacturers they are the one I absolutely will not touch. Not because of any inherent fanboyism or elitism, but just because I don’t know what I’m getting. They have no consistency. The 200 was marketed as an “accessible” version of the 300 at first, but anyone with 5 functioning brain…

As a Mopar fan I drove a 200 as a rental for a number of weeks, it was bleh. The steering had a weird twitch and the 2.4 Multiair motor was pretty damn slow.

And that’s the problem. Chrysler is historically a luxury brand, but the 200 is just as luxurious as a top-tier Accord.