Seems to be missing a key point: how someone reacts doesn’t define the act itself.

Of course we should all respect the right of people to decide what procedures they perform...just as we should respect the right of employers to only employ people who will perform the procedures the employer requires

It’s okay, he was drunk

Of course it is also possible that, say, the person in the right seat stated the right turn too vaguely, the person in the left thought they’d be leading with the nose, and then wham, the only one knowing the tail is going to swing left is the person who cannot see that direction

It should ;)

I don’t think that’s what happened. Looks to me like it snaps the instant it contacts the curb, before the tail passes over the corner.

Thrust provided by the main rotor pulls it along.

Would have made more sense for you to post that in response to one of the applicable people.

No one can honestly claim that it was definitely there without knowing how and why it occurred. It could be a racist act. It could involve drawing fucking names out of a hat to determine which models wear which items.

And apparently you tell even people that do not to go fuck themselves as well. That’s the part I addressed.

That’s not rationally a problem. The models were used for many different items of clothing.

So your response to this lady seeing things better than you do is fuck her

“Just a dumb little commoner.”

So some trash found an excuse to trash a few stores

So obviously pretty darn racist.

I’ve seen a few articles like this so far: ‘Haiti isn’t a shithole, look at their revolution’

So you’re not yet interested. As I said, let me know if that ever changes

You just contradicted my statement that I had answered that. The fact that I did makes your denial dishonest.

“Yes or no: are you suggesting completely abolishing all social welfare benefits?”

I answered your question, but you refuse the basic courtesy of even acknowledging mine. You just keep ignoring solely because you do not want to answer it.