Government NOT telling you to stop exercising your rights at a state line wouldn’t be a very good example of ‘big government’

Great news. Rights don’t end at state lines

If you find song lyrics offensive, then ALWAYS find them offensive.

“Because calling someone by a stereotypical name that is not their own because of their alleged ethnic or racial background is racist.”

He does have some weird eyebrows...looks like some sort of comic book character.

“Finally, justice has been served.”

Not even a single state mandates auto insurance. Hell, only some of them even require it to be able to drive on public roads

Great thing about organized labor: it doesn’t actually require any sort of agreement from an employer

I’d gladly chip in for that and other improvements.

So why should people just give up simply because you think it too late?

“And no, trained civilians shouldn’t have access to military-grade hardware either. You want to play with military toys? Join the military.”

So your criticism was that it is lopsided, but then you argue to make it more lopsided...and somehow don’t notice the issue there

So, for some reason, you don’t want to answer. I’m just checking to see if you even put the 2 and 2 together of your own statement

“Dude, the entire foundation of all civilized societies everywhere is that the state has a monopoly on the legitimate use of force.”

And we’re fortunate that you’re not getting what you want

So you recommend the government cease preventing Americans from purchasing more capable equipment?

“I feel like anyone who supports gun ownership immediately would dismiss them because I’m not a gun owner.”

Mankind tried the no guns thing for thousands of years. Millions of people were slaughtered left and right

No one should have to put up with any violation of their rights.

It may not be like religion, but it is the same idea as transsexualism