If you choose to prosecute someone, then you have to make sure they are offered representation. What about this is confusing you?
If you choose to prosecute someone, then you have to make sure they are offered representation. What about this is confusing you?
The internet is unnecessary...I notice you still keep using it
Which is just a different way of saying ‘you have a right to not be prosecuted without legal representation’...which is something you have, not something you’re given
“So, if lightning strikes my house and it catches fire, will the firefighters still come? How about if my cat knocks over a candle and that starts a fire, will they come then? Or, how about if I fall asleep while smoking and the cigarette catches fire, will the firefighters figure out what caused the fire before…
That’s like saying ‘ice should be a gas, not a solid’
No, you seem to be thinking of a ‘right to be given arms’...which doesn’t actually exist
“I have the right not to have my house burn down because my neighbor decided to start a brushfire during a drought, who is going to provide me with that service? Oh right, firefighters.”
But something that is not actually legally binding. I was never a fan of the name. Why use euphemisms?
Obviously health care is not a right. Just examine what we mean by ‘health care’: a product resulting from the time and effort of another and services provided by others
My grandfather worked as an adjunct professor for a while. Seemed like an okay gig: head over after work, teach a class, and head home . He enjoyed it and made a little extra money
“The hard part is just dealing with human greed.”
Prosecute them? You realize that they first have to be identified, right?
“from one place to another. not from one place, back to the same place. All you’re doing is picking a point somewhere along that loop and saying “hey look, a different place! I was here momentarily!”.”
“to go from one place to another, as by car, train, plane, or ship; take a trip; journey: to travel for pleasure.
“What.. The article doesn’t have to mention that its unusual - thats common fucking sense.”
From what I’ve read, they don’t have any clear evidence of a ‘hate crime’ so the decision is appropriate.
I agree, but there was a mistake
Any person who voted for Clinton voted against their own voice. That’s what it means to choose subjugation
“I’ve changed nothing.”
“The laws you refer to are very recent and came about specifically for drones. Anyone can still buy model rockets that can go over 500 feet and there is no control over them once launched.”