If even Lindsay Lohan is clued in that Putin and Trump are in bed... it must be true.

Ryan Reynolds speaks truth.

It isn’t utilitarian if it doesn’t cover my hairy legs.

We live in silos and I guarantee there are are people who think this is cute and funny. But we don’t know them. And FWIW I find it hokey but endearing.

She can’t win. (I mean she gets criticized no matter what, not that she won’t win the election).

For me, the most compelling part of this story is that my former high school principal is now the Upper School Division Head at Avenues.

She’s sat through 5 presidential elections since she was appointed to the court and never said a word. I’m sure she wasn’t a fan of any of the Republicans running in those races. So maybe she actually thinks Trump is an existential threat to the country? Maybe she hasn’t succumbed to the normalization of his…

For the judges who are bound by the code of conduct, what would the consequences be for violating it in the way she did?

I found it really itchy. The lower dose was less itchy for me, but still itchy.

No pain. Some itching for me.

It might not work with PCOS... I would ask a dermatologist. The manufacturer specifies that it is only proven on hereditary hair loss that follows a specific pattern- thinning hair at the part, the crown, and hairline.

There is a foam that you use once per day and drops twice per day. Its manufacturer says it works on a specific type of hair loss that is indicated by thinning hair at the part, the crown, and hairline. If all your hair is falling out evenly then you should see a derm.

My hair is thinning and I don't use dry shampoo. It is hereditary. But I started using Lady Rogaine and it works.

I'm a pretty partisan Democrat and would love to see a ton of gun restrictions but I find both parties are being such hypocrites about the terrorist watch list in relation to gun purchases.

Sounds like not really.

But now that so many pro-gun-control legislators have the spot it seems like it could be a top-down battle. Why doesn't Murphy et al throw it into the mix? It seems like low-hanging fruit from a PR standpoint because it doesn't actually have any direct or near term bearing on gun access.

Thank you. I read this post while hiding in the room next to the TV dodging Game of Thrones battle. So I was doubly traumatized.

Why isn’t anyone pushing legislation to repeal the Dickey Amendment which bans federal funding for research on guns? In the current moment it seems like that could be more toxic to vote against than actual gun control and the research could go a long way toward shifting the conversation. Even Dickey says sponsoring it…

My understanding is that was the actual point of forcing the vote. I don't think Murphy or any Dem actually thought their bills would pass.

I should have clarified IRL. I forget they aren’t only on the Internet.