Check it out. Houston Cars & Coffee. Blue GT350? Look Mustang, act Mustang, not Full Mustang. Lost control, hit the curb, scared some people. Not Full Mustang. You know the GT500 in Chicago? The white convertible? Reckless, yes. Mustang, maybe. Drove it into a tree. But he did his best not to hit anything else.…

5/5 Mustangs: When the out of control Mustang hits spectators/pedestrians. Threat level: Run for your life.

TRACTION control.... no. STABILITY MANAGEMENT... yes.

But with it on, you cant slide for the photo either.
Off is ok. Just drive better.

They’ve never fit that description. Because from the beginning, they were “Pony Cars”. Only since their rebirth post-2005 have they been called “Muscle Cars” but they really still aren’t. A Muscle Car was a fairly non-descript family car stuffed with a huge engine.

They don’t.

Thank you.

If your mother relied on a certain medication to be given to her everyday, or else she would die, I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t forget to administer said medication.

I have two daughters; a 7 year-old and 19 monther. I have never once not been 100% aware of when one or both was in a car with me. Not when they were newborns, and certainly not now when they can make noise. I’m not going to get into an intent discussion, but the reality is considering how many children are born each…

Apples to Elephants. Three of those items aren’t alive.

As the parent of (2) kids. I don’t know how one forgets, either.

If you don’t have the capacity to remember there is a human being in the presence of your vehicle, you’re either:

Automakers want known, consistent, targets to plan engineering efforts around. They don’t want a seesaw where Trump eases regulations, then the next president does a 180 and demands strict regulations quickly, etc.

1st Gear: Gas is cheap, and people don’t have a financial incentive to adopt hybrids/EV’s. Unfortunately, manufacturers have already invested millions in hybrid and EV technology and want to maintain current regulations so they keep their advantage.  

I’d imagine it’s a bit of a prisoner’s dilemma. Automakers want to build fuel efficient vehicles, but they’re more expensive or slower than the cars they currently offer. If everybody builds fuel efficient cars, buyers will shop based on price and features. However, if one manufacturer builds cheap, fast gas guzzlers…

3rd: So how exactly does a parent remember to dress a child before leaving the house, yet forgets the child is in the back seat prior to leaving the vehicle?

First Gear: People want the auto industry to compete on fuel efficiency, so they ask the government to mandate it?

It’s like everyone just forgot how things work.

unless you’re someone like me who will drive 1000+ miles in a day and only stop for fuel & restroom breaks. Stopping to eat is wasting time.

The weight is always placed on the axels, bruh.

These people have all been fired.

You either accept the front mid-engine layout or you go old school and deny the theory of the mid-engine layout all together and every car is either front-engined or rear-engined.