You realize the Times called attention to her first, yes?

If the statement about Palin inciting it is an opinion and not a statement of fact, then the Times wins. Opinions aren't defamation. False statements of fact are.

Except in Wisconsin, where she maybe should have campaigned.

Alleging a statement of fact that you know is false is the same as saying a statement of fact that you know is false.

It's universally acclaimed because it's good. Would it make you feel better if some critics arbitrarily gave a good movie a bad score so that you're not misled by rotten tomatoes?

Helpfully, the correction identifies the specific claims that are false: "An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The…

Fair enough.

Yes, but since they knew the claim was false (based on the fact that the Times had reported extensively on Loughner), actual malice is satisfied.

If only the defendant had a written archive with everything that the defendant knows written down in it.

They knew it was false and knowing is more than reckless.

The Times knew the claim was false. Actual malice isn't at issue.

Is there a link to the complaint?

It has the same showrunner as Iron Fist. Adjust your expectations accordingly.

Statute of limitations, weak evidence (maybe just uncorroborated testimony), and not wanting to get assaulted by a creep in a maga hat.

If you want to talk to people, you can't redefine terms unilaterally. That isn't how languages work, you stupid bicycle.

And any reforms to make it easier to put the rich in prison will make it even easier to put poor people in jail too.

Once they switch to kinja it will be easier to merge AV Club and io9, so that the same, repetitive, insightless reporting costs half as much.

"Just another city" is the most civic pride anyone from DC has ever had.

Yes.

I'm surprised this many people think the government should restrict speech. Have you seen who's in charge of it? Any power you want the government to have is a power you want Donald Trump and his appointees to have.