‘I guess it’s too much to ask that you read to the end of the first paragraph on the first story. You just keep proving over and over that you do not read anything properly before making a judgement.’

NONE of the women listed in that link are cited as having raped men.

‘Your statement was “the fact that women are not rapists.”’

Did you even read that list? Few of those examples were of women assaulting men; luring 15 year olds with booze and willing sex isn’t the same as raping a women who’s unconscious.

So was I; what’s your fucking confusion?

WTF are you talking about?

‘Why can you not understand this?’

Yeah; especially since it’s now impossible to reference any information outside of the internet.

‘I understand that your points are isolated and not part of the discussion everyone else was having.’

‘Yes, but we have this thing called context.’

‘Ok, so racial and gender profiling by police is okay, because statistics, gotcha.’

Until sororities start holding roofie parties and posting sexual assaults of men online, your argument is purely theoretical.

‘Again, nobody is talking about predatory behavior. We are talking about 2 people choosing to have sex while drunk, not some person who’s had a few drinks looking for the drunkest person to bang.’

‘You are the one who said you are speaking about something in a different context than we are, not me.’

So you get to decide the context of my comments?

It was a fucking joke, Sherlock.

‘Context isn’t really a subjective thing on a public conversation. It’s objective.’

Am I supposed to provide you with all the answers?

God is great, Sahib.

‘It was implied due to the context.’