I specifically referenced my response to that post with;

I’m not in total agreement there.

‘That was not the context of the post you replied to, which was clearly about two people who are equally drunk.’

You keep acting like we’ve been on the same fucking page when you’ve CONSISTENTLY misunderstood or misrepresented what I ACTUALLY FUCKING SAID.

‘No; what it means it that ACCORDING TO THE LAW, neither of them can legally provide consent because they are incapacitated.

‘What is so surprising about that?’

‘So, you understood my position to be in disagreement.’

‘Because you’re implying that they’re misogynists for not immediately taking a woman at her word, regardless of the facts of the case or available evidence.’

Think nothing of it; this is a sensitive issue.

‘You conflated disagreement with one or two issues as denying gender bias,’

I said only that your sentence was mystifying; I’m not correcting you and in point of fact, it’s been your dismissive and patronizing tone that has been underlining our discourse.

Well then you made your point incredibly poorly.

No; what a I said was that a reasonable person wouldn’t have any difficulty in discovering that most cops harbor both racist and misogynist beliefs.

Sure makes a contrast between a society that won’t pay women the same as men but doesn’t care what they wear.

You think the Horn of Africa will be as welcoming to a gay man seduced by the immoralities of the West, as Toronto was to you?

This sort of thing will simply stop immediately under the Trumpocalypse.

I guess they ran out of Micheal Phelps blowing his nose footage.

Obviously the same ‘rationale’ that would allow cops to follow institutionalized racist policies will only too easily transfer to equally embedded and archaic misogynist beliefs and practices.

‘I thought it was you who commented that men can’t be raped because they have a penis.’

I’m saying that nowhere on Earth are men being raped by women with anywhere near the frequency that men rape women; are you disputing that?