It shouldn’t be that hard to come up with a good name.
It shouldn’t be that hard to come up with a good name.
Moe: Garage? Well, ooh la di da, Mr. French Man.
Homer: Well what do you call it?
Moe: A car hole!
Yeah. This honestly sounds like ignorance on the locals’ part of the English language rather than a failure on the part of F1.
Naw, they actually do, that’s how they get paid, being in the public eye....all...the...time. Say something lame like “So excited to be here, my first time, thanks”, that takes 15 seconds. Move on. Brundle more pissed because of that wasted airtime.
Whatever you think of the Brundle grid walk, it’s not a problem. In fact, this is a good thing for them because otherwise you wouldn’t have mentioned the British Grand Prix today. And a lot of Twitter wouldn’t be talking about it either.
I’m not an F1 fan at all so maybe I don’t know what I’m talking about, but I’m assuming these grid walks are not open to the general public...right? I assume these celebrities are invited to participate, and are not buying access passes to walk the grid pre-race. If I was F1, I would make a rule that invited celebs…
The Grid walk is a place to be seen. Celebs put themselves there on purpose. They could low key go to an event just hang out in the in the luxury boxes. That being said, no means no. Brundle should have walked away, not sure if he kept pushing or if the producer in his ear kept pushing. I feel like if you’re on the…
Sorry, but I have to disagree. Celebs are public people and make TONS of money by being in the public eye. Don’t want to be in the spotlight? Stay in whatever fancy VIP area you’re at so the media don’t bother you. If you go where the media are, expect them to buttonhole you for a quote. I think she came off like an…
Bingo! The teams are trying to have their cake and eat it too. I would love to see Andretti (or any other new team for that matter) on the grid, preferably 2 new teams.
You alluded to it in the last paragraph, but I thought I would expand on that point more. The entry fee itself isn’t the real point of contention, it is just the latest beach head in the war. None of which has anything to do with the actual quality of racing, of course. Thats Formula 1!
As I have gotten older, the phrase “money doesn’t buy happiness” has steadly climbed the ranks of “dumbest shit I have ever heard”.
It’s sadly not intended to drink from.
Maybe I read the article wrong but does this:
Looking at a 5 grid place penalty for causing a collision.
Masi just weighed in and says “no steal here ... it’s just racing.”
Actually their argument is that if ALL of the lapped cars had been allowed to pass, as they usually are, the race would have ended under yellow. Basically they are complaining because they weren’t handed the win under yellow, despite all of their whining in the last week that they wanted to settle it on the track in a…
It has just been determined that my Terafactory makes Yottafactories, thereby making it superior to your Petafactory.
This is my gripe. If automakers want to have a suite of software-based bells and whistles that you can pay to subscribe to, whatever. But for shit that’s already in my car, fully self-contained, and doesn’t require a connection to the internet or any kind of digital service to work? Completely fucking appalling and…
Like everyone else, a subscription for an enhanced software feature that updates regularly is okay-ish. For physical features like heated seats, heck with that. I’ll tap a different wire and run my own switch to the hardware. $30 of electrical stuff is cheaper than $5 a month for heated seats.
Subscriptions are good and bad. I’d like the option to upgrade something or even to “deactivate” others from time to time.