the chemistry was worlds better pre-shaq. And I expected him to be fantastic for the show when it was announced

does this post actually make no sense to anyone else?

In fact, yes! You might even say that the December blog about Thibodeau over-relying on his starters and burning them out before the playoffs arrive is specifically mentioned and linked to in the post above this comment section.

The solution would have been for LaForce to have been more transparent. She could have prefaced her question to James with a clarification such as, “As we talked about just moments ago...” before asking for his thoughts.

Huh. It’s almost like human feelings are...nuanced.

I imagine that Jordan sees the same sociopathy dressed up as “competitive drive” in Kobe as he himself possesses. Lebron has more than zero friends so he’s automatically suspect.

Agreed. Sure, it wasn’t a great speech. However, the speech is as similar to Bane’s speech as the Ford F150 is to the Dodge Ram. They’re generically the same thing, but completely different.

Thank you for saying this. This is just so stupid and not even funny.

Every time you write an article like this and cry “plagiarism” ... even in jest ... where there is none, you strengthen the opposition. It allows them to go, “See ... fake news” and encourage people to ignore anything said about the President, even when it’s true.

So where’s the plagiarism aside from the five words “back to you... the people”?

What I really like is how you considered the moral implications for democracy of impeaching a President simply because they can and not for anything he has done to break the law. Not liking a President is not enough to impeach them, and would be a terrifying precedent to set.

For all of you saying “Ivanka flew JetBlue, there for she deserved it” replace flew JetBlue with “wore a shirt skirt” and see how you feel...

I’d say the reaction to a joke that was kinda clever, kinda meh, very harmless is perhaps a reason why Democrats lost the election.

What you’re saying is, Republicans who disagree with Trump can’t distance themselves from Trump because their party’s ideology spawned the Trump movement; therefore, Republican ideology = Trump ideology; therefore, Republicans who disagree with Trump... should not... exist? How do we explain so many Republicans…

Sam Biddle