If the pilot crashed into a mountain using FaceTime, I’d argue that’s accurate. Beyond that, if the pilot is employed by a company and the company deemed that the pilot was qualified and adequately trained for safety, you may have a case.
If the pilot crashed into a mountain using FaceTime, I’d argue that’s accurate. Beyond that, if the pilot is employed by a company and the company deemed that the pilot was qualified and adequately trained for safety, you may have a case.
You hit the nail on the head. I am frighteningly stupid! Personal responsibility is very, very scary.
Nope, I wouldn’t go after a car company ever in that scenario because that’s irrational to blame someone else for the product you purchased. I’d strongly consider going after the person who killed my kid assuming they were truly at fault because of the fact that they took a life directly with their choices and…
Without pulling patents, I can’t say for sure either. You could argue, though, that someone somewhere has patented products that allow you to drink a fluid without taking your hands off of the wheel, thus preventing distraction. Does that make the unrelated inventor of that product liable because he usurped Pepsi’s…
Sure did. They should sue the person who wronged them by hitting them with the car, not an unrelated company that happened to be being used while the crash occurred.
So that makes Apple liable?
Maybe, just maybe - hear me out on this - the person who hit you should be responsible because they hit you with a fucking car.
Taking responsibility for your own actions? Nah fuck that, sue ‘em!
Yup, the world’s ending because someone who disagrees with your immediate views is the President-elect. Sounds like the pot should call up the kettle.
This is why I assume you are poor.
I know that this site is made up of a commentariat of Gawker network participants who gobble up any anti-Trump rhetoric they can without any foresight or hindsight, but I don’t see any world where you can be anti-Trump and pro-combustion engine which I’d assume most “jalops” are. That’s my two cents.
Aston Martin. Aston Martin. Aston Martin.
purple ties matter
Nah, G550s are built like shit in terms of creature comforts. That said, with some big ol’ Blizzaks on that thing, it eats snow for hobby. Toss it in low range mode and cruise like dry pavement in 2 feet of powder.
These will have a real rough time with snow and ice.
I love this car and would consider owning one when I move on from my A7. Looks great in person also.
THIS. Even if you have money, financing can be smart. I had cash to buy my wife’s (certified pre-owned) Mercedes G550 in cash a few months back safely, but I still financed 60% because I was offered 1.9% on a five year term. I invest some in the market and some in real estate holdings and generally never see less than…
Nope. I’m an entrepreneur because I was sick of not having nice things in my life. I was raised relatively poor by my grandparents, raising five of their own kids and myself on <$40k year. My grandpa was a blue collar bus driver. I decided I didn’t want that life and worked both smarter and harder to fix that. While…
dogtruck
Contrary to common Jalopnik belief, the answer to everything is always G wagen. So, in this case, the answer is “very depreciated G wagen”. I’m sure you can find a diesel manual one that gets good MPG.