jonnybimmer
jonnybimmer
jonnybimmer

Sorry, but unless it needs to tow a heavy load or have the folks at Quigley give it the once over, Sprinter > Transit every time.

That’s because the ES now has a longer wheelbase that’s identical to the Avalon’s. Generally speaking though, all 3 cars (and some CUV’s) share the same platform. But hey, unlike previous gens, the ES now looks unique both inside and out.

That’s a bit unfair to include Lexus in there. They are by all accounts the most successful “new” luxury brand and one of the key reasons is that they, unlike Acura & to a lesser degree Infiniti, managed to create an identity that’s clearly distinct from their parent company Toyota. Sure mechanically speaking they

Many track oriented cars have some negative camber dialed in so that they have a more optimal contact patch when under load, when it matters. It also plays a role managing over/understeer, which is why track oriented RWD cars tend to have more camber up front and the FWD cars tend to have more camber in the rear.

The whole Nissan Pivo series was pretty strange to me. The general concept of moving a car sideways for easy parking has been around for many decades, but never before saw a car that would not only drive sideways, but have the body rotate around as well. Basically gives the car 4 “fronts”.

Ah, forgot about the City + Bike combo. That explains this:

The problem I have with Murcielagos is that owners too often try to make them look more “baller”. I mean, I guess it comes with the Lamborghini supercar territory, but if someone said they saw an exotic on huge chrome wheels, my first guess will always be a Gallardo followed by Murcielagos. That said, they really do

FTFY

Thought the old diesel Merc was a perfect match. Seems ideal on paper and has tons of internet support, but in the real world, you’re not sure if you’d be able to actually really function with it. Sure it works for some people with low-impact lives, but with big families or professionals who are trying to win over new

Not really crazy for “classics” being converted into EV cars (lookin’ at you Toyota), but if there was ever a car that deserved an electric motor transplant, it’s the DeLorean.

While I’m 100% onboard with you in regards with a few of your choices (458, Enzo, California), I feel labeling the LaFerrari, 488, and 360/430 ugly is a little harsh. And as far as non-ugly Ferraris go, IMO these are the two prettiest designs to come out of Maranello since the Daytona of the 70’s.

...why these companies choose San Francisco and other places that have stupid über-high rent/cost of living...

There’s A Production Porsche That Will Go Anywhere A Regular Beetle Can

Gonna have to disagree with this one. That massive torque does mean you need to be careful about your foot slipping off the clutch because these trucks are very difficult to stall, they’ll just lurch forward. However, it also means that you can drive it using the accelerator less, sometimes to the point where you

I mean, that’s one of many reasons why I would never do it with my car. However... No Stance owner would find this to be a surprise burden. These folks get into it knowing fully well that there’s going to be some areas they can’t go or will be very difficult to go to. It’s not that different than a truck owner being

I dont care what car you have, 65 mustang or a 240z if the shit you done to you car makes it worse - you’re a moron.

I’ve always wondered what about Stance gathers so much animosity whereas other show-car subcultures for the most part seem to get a pass.

Any manual car with a clutch setup for drag racing. Not really too big of an issue with domestics thanks to the wide range of pedal-less transmissions that are available for them, but the times I’ve had to move around some imports setup for racing (mainly Civics & Evos) was just miserable. Oh sure, a 800+hp Evo sounds

Any car with a computer-controlled clutch.

Nothing could possibly go wrong right?