You're confusing yourself. "Clinton returning to politics" is not an analysis, it is a literal statement of fact.
You're confusing yourself. "Clinton returning to politics" is not an analysis, it is a literal statement of fact.
That is such a cheap, lazy and tired attempt to shut down discussion.
…show you what money? And the comparison was "words that make people sound like a dick".
They all detail facts. Do you consider "that source about a year old story is a year old!" to be a credible excuse for not accepting it? Or "The CNN story is a nothingburger!" when it directly corroborates the claim I've made? Is Jim Comey a "reliable source" or not? I bet you thought he was when he was talking…
Stop misdirecting because you apparently can't fucking read.
Looks like you badly misjudged your readership's reception to this awful piece of trash television show.
But it's fine for you, or anyone, to think someone sounds like a dick when they say the word. I've never heard anyone of any race not sound like a dick when saying the word "phablet"…but it shouldn't be some taboo, banned word. Nothing should. People should just grow up in general and learn to judge context and…
Asks for sources, gets them, dismisses them completely with no attempt whatsoever to argue the facts presented. I'll mark you down as a coward who can't handle the truth if it doesn't fit their prejudices.
Where is the double standard?
I said she came back to politics, not that she was running for office.
You must have missed Comey's recent testimony. We know for a fact.
lol "I was wrong so now I'll just attack you personally". I'm not whining, I'm pointing out legitimate, provable double standards.
Jim Comey testified that Loretta Lynch instructed him to lie about the Clinton investigation in a manner that reflected the lies Hillary's campaign were telling. Don't you believe him? Cause I bet you did when he talked about Trump. That's not to mention the destruction of evidence and lying to investigators.
Oh my goodness an ad hominem attack in lieu of an intelligent counter argument. On The AV Club?! Well, I never!
My solution is everyone act like adults and judge each usage they encounter on its individual merits. No word should be effectively banned or restricted to certain races, I find the idea absurd.
Copped it on the chin? She lied and destroyed evidence. Even having done that there was enough there for her to be charged over her mishandling of classified intel, the FBI balked. Now we know for a fact (even though it was obvious at the time) that Loretta Lynch was intervening on her behalf. There isn't a single…
When you show me the law that says that's how the US election works.