So they can use it however they like without being assholes? And whites can't use it at all without being assholes?

What are the circumstances where non-white people can use it outside of a discussion about racial slurs which wouldn't also make them an asshole? And do all non-whites get a pass, or just black people?

Hey, if Hillary wants to make noise about re-entering the political scene, her illegal dealings become fair game for comment once again. Especially when they highlight a double standard in the justice system.

I could never excuse or defend his opinions on things like Sandy Hook but I gladly welcome him exposing the underhand tactics of people like Kelly.

You misread it.

As she is recording it herself, no action where she claimed "he was recording too, unfair!" would ever fly. But it's irrelevant because he has it in his contract that he gets to record, he is by no means new to this game.

The very fact that you have to cherry pick extreme examples disproves your own point. When you have to hold up things that are so notably out of the norm, then the government itself is clearly not tyrannical in nature or practice. You're employing hysterical rhetoric that does nobody any good, people with their head…

Step aside everyone, we got a "history major" comin through here! Jesus christ. If you honestly think the current US government is "tyrannical", you should ask for your money back on that course, because whoever educated you failed you very badly.

The comments of an anonymous internet commenter (who, BTW, I couldn't give a fuck how many SJWs have chortled at online, if that's how you measure a person's worth you are fucked in the head) in conjunction with millions of others and a heavily slanted media all building a culture of extreme violent rhetoric do more…

That's one way to lose an argument even more profoundly I guess.

My contention is that was a hypocritical, stupid thing to say. Your victim complex is a whole other matter.

Goes on a hysterical rant to defend "a beloved penis-themed internet commenter"….has the astonishing lack of self-awareness to tell anyone else to "find a purpose". Holy moly.

None of those are the arguments the commenter made though. They painted the target of their disdain as something they aren't whilst gleefully proclaiming themselves to be that very thing. Essentially because "they deserve it".

…and with that irrelevant aside out of the way, feel free to try arguing against things I actually say.

You don't seem to understand what a tyrannical government actually is.

That might make more sense if I advocated for violence against the lead scientist at the Antarctic research station. As I did no such thing, you are utterly without a point.

I'm not a republican. Or even American. Just an observer of increasingly violent rhetoric that lead to an assassination attempt, that certain people are too stupid to see they fueled.

I never thought David Tennant could be so badly miscast in anything but here we are. This looks utterly terrible.

Congratulations on contributing to yesterday's attack and learning absolutely nothing from it.

I think she has a point to be honest. She's dead wrong, in my opinion, arguing for charges against him to be dropped, but it must be somewhat demeaning for certain groups to be holding her up as a poster child for their own personal cause some forty odd years after the fact when she really just wants to live a normal…