I thought this originated in the Daily Mail rather than The Mirror and, well... Daily Mail.
I thought this originated in the Daily Mail rather than The Mirror and, well... Daily Mail.
So it’s worth changing, and not in a meaningless “we’re mad at them!” way like Freedom Fries.
I think you’re the only person I’ve read who was this enthusiastic about Eternals, outside of Zhao herself. I was mainly going to dispute the idea that Eternals is divisive, because even the positive reviews tended to be fairly tepid, “It’s not the worst Marvel movie...Zhao has some nice compositions when it’s not…
If something is “divisive” that usually means it creates two very distinct (good/bad) responses. Zhao’s “the divisiveness coming from critics and the fans” doesn’t make sense, nor does this article’s “divisive response to Eternals”.
For me, the problem with Eternals wasn’t that it was different or ambitious - that was fine. The problem is it introduces an enormous cast of characters for us to get to know, then dumps a ton of exposition on us about those characters, then we learn that everything the characters know (that we just learned) is wrong,…
This is such a weird take to read. Not because how one should feel when watching the film, but because I didn’t that is all in line with the general criticism I read about it.
I don’t know that anyone HATED the Eternals, or was mad about Zhao directing, or mad that it deviated from source material.
Eternals felt like a Phase 2 movie to me. I didn’t hate it, but it felt long. Just so very long. And despite using characters the general public knew nothing about, and making the bold choice of having Zhao direct, the whole movie felt like it was playing it too safe. (And man, the standard MCU quips just did not fit…
I wanted to like this movie and there was a lot of stuff in it that really worked for me (including maybe the cleverest meta gag I’ve ever seen in a film), but the editing just felt off in a way that’s hard to put into words.
None of us are visiting this site again, but for our own beautiful reasons.
A poor adaptation of a videogame? Well that’s a first.
The first couple episodes of the new season of Star Trek: Picard have been pretty good.
Go watch Detroiters. That’s the only reason I got the service, and it was worth it.
“One: Ahsoka needs to be louder, angrier and have access to a time machine. Two: whenever Ahsoka’s not on screen, the other characters should be saying, ‘where’s Ahsoka?’”
As long as Villeneuve is involved and they disregard the comically inept cash grabs that are the non-Herbert Dune books, I look forward to whatever comes of this cryptic sound bite.
Can’t you just feel the bad breath of Brian Herbert... thick and reeking of onions.
Everything you’ve listed here is completely optional to the player. Get stuck on a boss? Summon help. Melee too tough? Used ranged bows or spells. Care about the Lore? Read item descriptions or look it up online. I don’t see how any of this is bad.
No explanation for anything is a staple of the souls games. I kind of like it because it encourages community driven testing and discoveries which results in an actual community forming around the game.
It was a joke. The young Luke the article is referring to is about seven years old.