IF these things can fly at 70+mph, why have we not harnessed them for passenger travel? It has to be more fuel efficient than a jet for short distance flights, and it can go in a straight line, unlike trains and highways.

11/10 that's the exact description of the place where I used to be an oil jockey. And every place I've taken my car for repairs or inspection.

The answer is, of course whoever can afford one. And they should put it in Flint. You know. To revive the local economy.

The Newborn Endangered also works

The Bourne Amberlamps

I wasn't using it politically, just to emphasize the "You could have stopped this" meme.

Aside from the very few circumstances where living in a HOA is absolutely mandatory (which the internet will be sure to point out), you can prevent things like this. By not lving in HOA's. The "added value" of the "better property" is cancelled out by the fees and added hassle.

Does nobody remember Dolly Man?

Probably because 90% of drivers wold drive off a bridge immediately. Hey, the roads would be less busy!

Mario Kart 64 is the only right answer. I was playing some yesterday. It aged pretty well, aside from the graphics.

Remember that time Lamborghini made that mid engined coupe that became a BMW?

I once turned left onto Woodward Avenue in Detroit, not realizing

The joke

Pretty sure you meant Lambo, dude.

You have my attention.

Where was there an 85 MPH speed limit anywhere in the US "a couple years" or more ago? Or even now?

;_;

theoretically, you wouldn't need an airbag if you were in a 4/5/6 point, correct? (Not that you "NEED" one anyways...)
Could the advent of steering wheel mounted HVAC and audio controls herald a new era of race-harness, air-bagless cars?

Oh, I'm daydreaming again.