jollybootsofdoom
JollyBootsOfDoom
jollybootsofdoom

Fine by me, just one more game from them I won't be purchasing.

I'm not going to go as far as others have and say if you can't afford the $100 you shouldn't be making games or anything, but Steam isn't the only option. It may be the biggest and best chance to get your game in front of as many people as possible, but it isn't like this is "Go Steam or go home". There are plenty of

I actually traded my ps3 copy in for an xbox copy. Just tired of waiting to play Dawnguard when I knew others already had it.

There are more people with phones than there are people with a dedicated gaming machine. Amazing revelations here. Next you'll be telling me more people play console games with a controller than don't.

This....really doesn't make Home all that much weirder. From the little time I spent on there, the place already had dancing PyramidHead guys being followed by bright ponies arguing with flaming-headed pixies while also hitting on a nearly naked anime girl with a name that was something like XxDavidDudeBroxX. It was

I'm glad Alice: Madness Returns got through before this whole "Everything must be socially connected!" thing really picked up.

I....you do realize EA doesn't make the Assassins Creed games, right?

At the risk of being seen defending anything Beck ( the man deserves almost all the hate he gets), that was kind of a dick move by Spector. We don't all get to pick our bosses, many of us hate who we work for, but do it anyways because we need the money. It just doesn't sit well with me that this guy not only had the

Didn't they say this once before and then implemented it on their next game anyway? Did I just dream that?

You realize it isn't an "either/or" situation, right? Some people are able to thoroughly enjoy both dark, gritty games and light-hearted fantastical romps. I love the Mass Effects and Deus Exs of the gaming world, but there is plenty of room for the Kingdom Hearts and Final Fantasys there as well. It'd be a very

Heh. Bordlernads. *snicker*

You shouldn't care. Yet you obviously do, because every time an article related to XIII comes up you have to cry as if SE has somehow crushed your poor little hopes and dreams. They change up Final Fantasy with every iteration, why can't you simply just be displeased with the direction this particular section of the

Awesome, if it is anything like XIII-2, count me in.

Yea dammit! We're going to bitch about how everybody else keeps releasing the same game over and over again, and then bitch at you for even thinking about changing this series up!

"Dammit Square Enix, you should only make games that interest me in particular! ME! Fuck anybody else, even if they like your recent games! It's all about me!"

Have to disagree. Last year I was rolling in the games. this year, I have this, and Assassins Creed 3. Then nothing else until march when the South Park RPG drops.

You know, I'd probably buy a game with a character voiced by a mentally-handicapped komodo dragon.

I'm not usually one to complain about the gender/race articles here on Kotaku, but this seems to really be reaching for something to complain about. What does it matter if the voice actor is a white female, a black female, or an 80 year old latino male as long as the voice used fits the character?

I'm fine with this. Liked XIII and loved XIII-2, so I can't wait to see what's in store for XIII-3.

Oh waahh. "Somebody liked something I didn't!"