Or maybe the jury didn’t find her credible. That’s what juries do. Make judgements on how credible they find witnesses.

That’s not the way it works. A company isn’t responsible unless you complain, and they ignore you, and it happens again. They get a chance to fix it.

Whoever wrote this sounds like a really crappy DM or someone who’s been subjected to many crappy DMs.

Consent is binary, just like sexual assault convictions

Found the square.

You have to prove the exposure is FOR THE PURPOSE OF SEXUAL GRATIFICATION. Being naked is not a crime. Being too lazy to wear pants and answering the door nude is perfectly legal, in every state. You just can’t be doing it for a sexual thrill.