johnsonpark1
JohnsonPark
johnsonpark1

“This is black 9/11...

Who paid for this? I wonder if they broke even ...

... yeah - leggings and all.

therealdonaldtrump: "Ka-sitch, you're a loser. A disgrace. Total headcase. Can't even prevent this. When I'm president America will be winning again, okay?"

Huh ... interesting to see that basketball apparently sucks in Greece, too.

The real tragedy here is that a grown-ass man would leave the house to be seen in public in a bright yellow t-shirt. Unless that is clearly a logoed Pirates shirt of some sort - and it doesn't appear to be one - that man should not be allowed to reproduce.

Again - this is NOT an admission that employees/management acted inappropriately when requesting the bookclub quiet down (“mistreatment”? please ...). And when asked repeatedly to quiet down, the bookclub chose to argue rather than comply with a simple request out of common courtesy. This refusal led to all that ensued

No - the CEO did not determine that the employees were wrong in asking the bookclub to quiet down. At no point in his statement does he say that the women were not being sufficiently loud to warrant warnings to quiet down, or that the employees/management shouldn’t have requested they respect the rights of other

... and who determines whether a particular group is sufficiently loud as to warrant a warning? That’s right - employees/management.

Apparently, the first-person accounter" you cited wasn't there, either ...

trumped-up “eyewitness accounts” from Yelp crusaders as first-person narratives.

Again - comprehension is key ...

The CEO stating that the tour was “100% wrong” does not mitigate the fact that the women were loud (they themselves admit this), that employees/management on board at the time deemed the women sufficiently loud as to need to be asked to quiet down (the women admit having been asked repeatedly to quiet down, for the

Yes - the requests WERE reasonable. Tour employees/management determine what levels of “loud” are acceptable, and what levels begin to infringe on the rights of other passengers to enjoy their trip. In this instance, employees/management deemed the bookclub members to be too loud, and respectfully requested they quiet

The poster was alleging that the women got themselves kicked off, and the company was right to kick them off.

You’ve provided no evidence that the incident was racially motivated beyond the fact that eleven of the twelve women involved were black. You keep harping on a racial motivation being “plausible” - why? What reason would the employees and management at the tour company have to exhibit racially-biased behavior toward

You don’t do the reading thing much, do you?

Yes - you've suggested it was all along, on no evidence.

Good. Now let’s drop the Pens and Hawks and all will be right with the world.

There is no evidence that the issue was racially motivated. The CEO didn’t suggest it was racially motivated. YOU suggested it was racially motivated. It wasn't racially motivated.