johnnyfootbaw
JohnnyFootbaw!!
johnnyfootbaw

Reminds me of a line from Scrubs when Cox tells JD “I didn’t do it because I like you. I did it because it’s my job.”

Apparently yelling “Chocolate Thunder!” in a team meeting is frowned upon in this organization.

I also may have just put a Chocolate Thunder destroying a backboard gif into the slides for a team meeting I’m running in 14 minutes. If I get in trouble, I’m coming after Dustin Faber up there :-P

As a Virginian, I have to say...it is.

Oh man, I used to have that VHS. With Marv Albert and Frank Layden. That video made 6 year old me such a fan of Spud Webb and Chocolate Thunder.

Um, what? How did Gillespie not back Trump’s agenda? He was unabashedly racist. He backed the Nazi’s in Charlottesville. He tried to tie the Dems to MS-13. EVERYTHING he did was out of Trump’s playbook. And sure, there were some Republicans in VA who still supported him because “they didn’t want to be at fault when

Our thoughts and prayers for Krombopulous Michael’s great sacrifice. The only defense against a bad guy with a website is a good guy with a browser.

So you’d rather have the openly racist corporatist? Because not voting for the lesser of two evils means you get the greater of two evils. Sure, I’d prefer neither, but that’s not an option.

If you want to follow through on Christian ideology, “God helps those who help themselves.” Or, if you want to be part of the “Secular Left” and take a more scientific approach, “trust but verify.” Either way, changing nothing and assuming that results will change is just stupid.

No, but it suggests why banning cars isn’t as simple as banning guns. Guns have one purpose — to kill things. Bigger, faster firing gun are only intended to kill more things more quickly. There is no purpose for a semi-automatic rifle for defending your home (where it’s too large of a weapon to maneuver and aim

You’re right, it only SIMULATES killing things. It doesn’t change the fact that a gun is designed ONLY to kill when you instead use it to simulate doing so.

You’re right, the second amendment does state that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It also states that a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state. Yet militias are shut down, especially when they begin infringing on OTHER right.

I’m an idiot, he went pro last year.

Is it a career if he’s not getting paid? Isn’t “student” currently his career, according to the NCAA?

“Any tool is a weapon if you hold it right.” Right, but, again, a gun has NO OTHER PURPOSE. A hammer still helps to build a house. A car still helps get goods from one place to another. A gun ONLY KILLS THINGS.

Here’s the difference. Cars have a purpose other than killing. Most materials for making a bomb have a purpose other than killing. Guns ONLY purpose is to kill things. And things like semi-automatic rifles only purpose is to kill more things more quickly.

My point was that, as usual, as soon as there is a mass shooting, the question is “what could have been done to prevent this....without touching guns?” Looking at New York, an immigrant runs people over and it’s “ban all immigrants!” Over 80 people are killed in two mass shootings separated by a month, and yet there

Here’s a fun thought experiment. If the people perpetrating these mass shootings didn’t have access to guns, how many people would they have shot?

And for all anyone knows, he was going to start performing CPR on his shooting victims before someone spooked him by shooting at him. Or, for all anyone knows, he was going to start pooping rainbows, reveal himself as a person with control over life and death, and resurrect all of them.

I hate the fact that, when I saw the headline about Texas, my first thought was “Please let it have been a white guy.” That’s how fucked up things are right now.